Re: [Dime] Comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Wed, 12 May 2010 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB77F3A690A for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.370, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihUebFYdvd4M for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa01-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.89]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CE4683A68A4 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4098 invoked from network); 12 May 2010 03:07:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (111.84.208.16) by p3plsmtpa01-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.89) with ESMTP; 12 May 2010 03:07:43 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'Qin Wu' <sunseawq@huawei.com>
References: <010a01caf0e1$0961e980$23548a0a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <010a01caf0e1$0961e980$23548a0a@china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:07:24 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <01f301caf180$44c1a610$ce44f230$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acrw4Q2aAh4EySyqRv26zbSM6NLGZAAnoQjw
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 03:07:58 -0000

Qin Wu [mailto:sunseawq@huawei.com] writes:

> Hi, Glen:
> Could you take care of the comments from Tom below?

I have no idea what the purpose of the domain identifier might be;
similarly, adding a table to section 5.2 would seem only to add verbiage,
rather than utility, to the draft.

> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Taylor" <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
> To: <dime@ietf.org>; "wuqin" <sunseawq@huawei.com>; "Glen Zorn"
> <gwz@net-zen.net>
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:55 AM
> Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03
> 
> 
> >I have a couple of comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03.
> >
> > 1) As suggested in my previous E-mail, the attributes contained in the
> Key AVP
> > should probably include an applicable domain identifier (in the
> absence of which
> > the key is not domain-specific), and an enumeration indicating usage.
> The two
> > usages I see are reauthentication root key and master session root
> key. In a bow
> > to RFC 5295, I suppose DSRK should be added to and stand at the head
> of this
> > list. Obviously the usage list has to be extensible -- another IANA
> registry.
> >
> > 2) Minor comment: I would think section 5.2 itself would contain a
> table listing
> > the values to be registered. Of course, if my suggestion is adopted
> the details
> > of this will be different.
> >
> > Tom taylor
> >
> >