Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion
Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> Mon, 18 July 2016 10:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ddolson@sandvine.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FDD12D08C for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rP8F2Yos487F for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (Mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F2312D4FB for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WTL-EXCHP-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::68ac:f071:19ff:3455]) by wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:10:31 -0400
From: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
To: "jouni.nospam@gmail.com" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshitz@sandvine.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: slide for RFC4006bis discussion
Thread-Index: AdHfmdgffm5vJqrITTiB8hPBrUVu1ABOre8AAAlnGwAAB3XeMA==
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:10:31 +0000
Message-ID: <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E983102393A@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com>
References: <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE4930CA31D9@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE4930CA5EC0@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <747c3ab4-0aef-0f9f-1f33-8ab899385f07@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <747c3ab4-0aef-0f9f-1f33-8ab899385f07@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.196.10]
x-c2processedorg: b2f06e69-072f-40ee-90c5-80a34e700794
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/gBcMwfeRNvh2LtXg1FTY473E4Ak>
Subject: Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:10:36 -0000
I find it unlikely that only some of the IPv6 notations are supported in real implementations. RFC4006 is not clear enough to be interpreted rigorously, I don't think. -----Original Message----- From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 11:42 AM To: Yuval Lifshitz; dime@ietf.org Cc: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] (Lyle.T.Bertz@sprint.com); Dave Dolson; Lionel.morand@orange.com Subject: Re: slide for RFC4006bis discussion Quick notes.. for the IPv6 redirect address you should reference to rfc5952. To make this properly, I think you should comform with all possible ways to write the addresses (specifically the zero compression stuff). However, I am also fine limiting the options to two as it leaves less room for incompatabililty issues ;) - Jouni 7/18/2016, 2:14 AM, Yuval Lifshitz kirjoitti: > Thanks for the comments. Updated slides 3 and 4. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yuval Lifshitz > Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2016 10:52 PM > To: dime@ietf.org > Cc: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] (Lyle.T.Bertz@sprint.com); Dave Dolson; > Lionel.morand@orange.com; Jouni.nosmap (jouni.nospam@gmail.com); Yuval > Lifshitz > Subject: slide for RFC4006bis discussion > > Dear group, > Attached slides for the RFC4006bis discussion. Please let me know if you want more topics to be added. > > Regards, > > Yuval >
- Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion Dave Dolson
- Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]
- Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion Yuval Lifshitz
- [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion Yuval Lifshitz