[Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.5

"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Thu, 05 December 2013 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB651AE091 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:04:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYNgWNGSJBZ7 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170ED1AE093 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net ( with ESMTP id rB5G4VkC014156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:04:32 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ( with ESMTP id rB5G4VoK014102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:04:31 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([]) by DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:04:31 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OVLI: comments to 4.5
Thread-Index: Ac7x065WBGZ2oIAhQo2K4GQZ6Z6CDA==
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:04:30 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DB5E@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DB5EDEMUMBX014nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 3178
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1386259472-000030AF-859DEA1D/0-0/0-0
Subject: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.5
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:04:38 -0000

Dear all,

here are comments to clause 4.5:

1. (linked to a previous comment to 4.3) The first sentence should be modified to read

   The OC-Validity-Duration AVP (AVP code TBD4) is type of Unsigned32
   and describes the number of seconds the OC-OLR AVP and its content is
   valid since the creation of the OC-OLR AVP (as indicated by the
   OC-TimeStamp AVP).

2. A default value of 5 seconds does not make much sense when the Reduction-Percentage is absent or takes the value 0. Proposal is to modify text as follows:

   The default value for the OC-Validity-Duration AVP value is 5 (i.e. 5 seconds).  When the OC-Validity-
   Duration AVP is not present in the OC-OLR AVP, the default value applies, unless the Reduction-Percentage AVP
   is absent or takes the value 0, in which cases the validity is unlimited.

Best regards