Re: [Dime] DIME WG Call for adoption draft-mcmurry-dime-overload-reqs-02

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 06 September 2012 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302BA21F866A for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2m76zspcp8bj for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4D621F84B6 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.30] (cpe-76-187-92-156.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.92.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q86DpQt3040414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:51:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <1FD6C07D-675B-4190-832C-D07F59DF1CF1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:51:30 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0BF1FFDF-FD6A-4122-A58A-61BB7905BC00@nostrum.com>
References: <1FD6C07D-675B-4190-832C-D07F59DF1CF1@gmail.com>
To: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 76.187.92.156 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: dime@ietf.org, dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] DIME WG Call for adoption draft-mcmurry-dime-overload-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:51:37 -0000

I support making this draft a work group item. (I assume that's obvious, but still worth stating for the record :-)  )

Thanks!

Ben.

On Sep 6, 2012, at 3:31 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> This email starts a two week consensus call on adopting:
> 
> 	Title           : Diameter Overload Control Requirements
> 	Author(s)       : Eric McMurry
>                         Ben Campbell
> 	Filename        : draft-mcmurry-dime-overload-reqs-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 25
> 	Date            : 2012-08-28
> 
> as a Dime WG document.  Please state your opinion (either for or
> against) on making this draft a WG draft either on the mailing list or
> to the chairs.  This call will end September 20, 2012.
> 
> - Jouni & Lionel
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime