IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] [ALU] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-02

"Gardella, Maryse (Nokia - FR/Nozay)" <maryse.gardella@nokia.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <maryse.gardella@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E44127698; Wed, 3 May 2017 06:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uM8_0vy5HT-A; Wed, 3 May 2017 06:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr50112.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.5.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9B3129B37; Wed, 3 May 2017 06:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ddUnGv6Dm+mMnuhme1Q/cy/9CokSVPNy+VDl1VyFeo8=; b=hxONHZplnyHTJ/BWyt+pzDTZPaZ6qIYiQF2NhXAIDTAth7J7s309Lbb0t3ejuXJN2ohUBguc+QGltqWsKt6lDu5QdgauujZ4yoolf6kgbb+KdVga87dVOjC4Lu9oDOP5RKQlS3rKDNNA4z5uNsITXfP2OxmL7Ftq4bhqNu9EZrk=
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2857.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.91.147) by HE1PR0701MB2858.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.91.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.1; Wed, 3 May 2017 13:21:29 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2857.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.91.147]) by HE1PR0701MB2857.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.91.147]) with mapi id 15.01.1075.010; Wed, 3 May 2017 13:21:29 +0000
From: "Gardella, Maryse (Nokia - FR/Nozay)" <maryse.gardella@nokia.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
CC: Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshitz@sandvine.com>, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [ALU] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-02
Thread-Index: AQHSw4y3iSssb1Vk+0CBBkhlVtGV+aHhlVEAgAAPpYCAAO2PwA==
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 13:21:29 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0701MB285719DD14A7786035A41917FC160@HE1PR0701MB2857.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <FFB3377A-3F65-456E-8EFC-CBBA2B671566@gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB2857B67205A4B3CD908191FCFC100@HE1PR0701MB2857.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE497007F6E1@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98705BA165@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE497007FABD@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <20170428113946.5161041.83399.10532@sandvine.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98705C5971@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <670A9410-00F7-4883-B714-E0CA5E9A1234@deployingradius.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98705C5B5A@wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com> <3ABC7A8B-00DD-4032-85F0-D712A5517622@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ABC7A8B-00DD-4032-85F0-D712A5517622@deployingradius.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: deployingradius.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;deployingradius.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [135.245.212.21]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1PR0701MB2858; 7:U+UINXdz0t3Je7ALJSqv+vwx1mkDIxg9ok476e4B2gKpkE1pIg3jm+u3YdUSA7O9Hczu2mkUdVYPeojfRyY8l9G0O7vCm8stJBmZnFUE/LrZ/phNquM8L/9LGAKRIHMzTwWScW6Tg+FRVF2UaYkVxlkYVZXZQAJDPm6F9vaMYSHBvPuax9u7Al8LEJeCkrdD3Jx6Jat60wRvT8VcfztSiPhMqOVxFpUEPJVvSCsiJ8aS5/jiAdw6aaylwiHHgFLcy5ky60FePxn7InFwYusJ4yTvZJkRRukUsKrWhYFfPWfGLP+YJdPHAQYQGPhHaMwUL3ev27aX0qYSpm4AUVpbGA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: db9f76bc-0f38-405c-d90a-08d492274f28
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2858;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0701MB2858627D1D525CC041893462FC160@HE1PR0701MB2858.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(82608151540597)(788757137089);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2858; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2858;
x-forefront-prvs: 029651C7A1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39400400002)(39850400002)(39860400002)(39840400002)(377454003)(13464003)(53754006)(24454002)(229853002)(189998001)(77096006)(6506006)(25786009)(53546009)(9686003)(86362001)(230783001)(53936002)(3846002)(93886004)(2950100002)(6436002)(7736002)(305945005)(39060400002)(4326008)(74316002)(5660300001)(54906002)(6116002)(55016002)(99286003)(102836003)(478600001)(3660700001)(66066001)(8936002)(76176999)(50986999)(2906002)(81166006)(54356999)(2900100001)(8676002)(6246003)(33656002)(7696004)(3280700002)(38730400002)(122556002)(17413003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR0701MB2858; H:HE1PR0701MB2857.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 May 2017 13:21:29.2546 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0701MB2858
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/i64mhKGntFgXQG7xVkKmGC10CGo>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [ALU] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-02
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 13:25:55 -0000

Hello all,

For the new AVP, no question: RFC 7542 should be used.
I have not the full overview of 3GPP specs used for reference to NAI, and based on:
- assuming the TS 23.003 (Numbering, addressing and identification) is an important spec to consider, the RFC 4282 is used
- RFC 6377 DBP also referring to RFC 4282
 
I would tend to agree on at least using RFC 4282 as the reference for the END_USER_NAI in Subscription-Id-Type for RFC4006bis.
Whether to directly refer to RFC7542, I cannot confirm whether this is acceptable or not.  

BR
Maryse

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan DeKok [mailto:aland@deployingradius.com] 
Sent: mercredi 3 mai 2017 00:47
To: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
Cc: Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshitz@sandvine.com>; Gardella, Maryse (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <maryse.gardella@nokia.com>; jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>; dime@ietf.org list <dime@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] [ALU] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-02

On May 2, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Alan.
> Do I correctly hear you saying we should replace all references to RFC 2486 with RFC 7542?

  Yes.

  It's 2017.  Independent of RFC 7542, *inter-operable* implementations just have no business using non-UTF8 identifiers.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email