Re: [Dime] Another round of WGLCs and WG status

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 25 May 2010 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDADA3A6AE0 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.600, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IsnzqjH-6OZL for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343A33A6AA9 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so305892wwe.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=L/q4W8+VPs61fbCZ0BS/ef43Xy/xhUhrUnQuNFNfruE=; b=d0W6QVOIJGw85SigN6cfD3pPrYVzjnVsOMCIld3p4fUrjilVES3s5rxNyN6aIl0qPx rcDvLgoGRX0oQ9PbWYa49NGwzlf1HOQJHncFf2Uq7giCsx4+NmRStpAlsEAA8mqHl8OR sQAT4zDUa/njpZfr5hIEmmOsW2TBRxeKvQ5gI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=PObshjL7b1bK2k4WMuVICc7f5V8/DQv7nyK8/tYstSNs4xuDFW0SlHoz+LRmmDPO/A 7l0nurgNyg0zfAs+wdJwWsEYSQYf3gOK49PLQY7q/wgKmFdQ8M7bX8tGYQ3zykeQz9jd BlXkFd7kSLhYjFYFHzf5yrWhaMfB9DYv22mzo=
Received: by 10.227.143.66 with SMTP id t2mr6579050wbu.116.1274778625553; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.254.1.146] ([192.100.123.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u36sm38172803wbv.0.2010.05.25.02.10.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 May 2010 02:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <017301cafbce$09c10580$1d431080$@net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:10:18 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1033CE87-B78F-4765-9F50-29FEDE6D03CE@gmail.com>
References: <10A80F70-2ED3-4A02-9711-7A5ED6C702D1@gmail.com> <0F3F1973-63CA-41E1-903A-35D3894D507D@gmail.com> <017301cafbce$09c10580$1d431080$@net>
To: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Another round of WGLCs and WG status
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:10:39 -0000

On May 25, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Glen Zorn wrote:

> jouni korhonen [mailto://jouni.nospam@gmail.com] writes:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We can conclude from the WGLC that local-keytran and also pririty-avps
>> (though we got only 2 comments..) can move on. Authors, provide
>> revisions that addresses all comments on your documents and we'll move
>> them forward.
> 
> It would be helpful if the chairs would provide a list of the accepted
> changes since (in the case of local-keytran, at least) not all comments were
> valid.

We could hold your hand as well ;) Anyway, seriously, I though to put all stuff to tracker (just like RADEXT started to do) if folks would be OK with that. It is a bit more spam on the list but would be rather clear to follow each separate topic assuming folks would use it systematically.

Regarding the local-keytran case, which part of the comments you refer here? Domains?

- Jouni

> 
> ...
> 
>