[Dime] draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19 and IANA considerations
jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 08 December 2009 08:27 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF7F3A67A6 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:27:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8sfzQn68uaS for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048C63A6809 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so5933723fxm.28 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:27:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=a7NvfbHGckkiqRDEkZwb8G7GkfRmTq37eNvgIwQUq4c=; b=ho2ti8iksnaiJBPoMbQu+lLRkU50rtc9wOoxE5nhTms41vlVuPoz3cWBGg6iCOC30U beVABhMtJy/COIJTfQTAOR2ZxLjeCa26KDZ3uhoB6jdg3wpjZ+Khl9iNK+tXQNTNMHVg /myasxda5BHgpRZC7nNL7jJVEbHAG47eM+KZQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=gg6BWMJhujzLMD/5JlwjuG4e+uLvGVDrdBVyEMSk4YQ/34DGC1it8n8G3owSMjKXcG uJsn+1WYIizrT5q1wC03y0N4FojI40z053MNDIFKWzI7pv+wUUY1o5p12E61409+63Il +sNj0gD7BQi124NuiAkzzvp4Q/vAxJUk1ISwk=
Received: by 10.86.249.26 with SMTP id w26mr6792880fgh.49.1260260865596; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a88-114-169-62.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a88-114-169-62.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.169.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm19815039fga.27.2009.12.08.00.27.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:27:44 -0800 (PST)
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:27:43 +0200
Message-Id: <CE94EF0B-FF2A-4A36-ACEC-5A6B874ABA74@gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Subject: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19 and IANA considerations
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:28:00 -0000
Hi, Reading the Section 11.6 NAPTR Service Fields. It appears to me that there is no IANA registry defined for these NAPTR service and protocol fields. Not in RFC3588 and not for NAPTR in general (meaning RFC2915 and RFC3403). Therefore, shouldn't this document create one as hinted in Section 9 of RFC3403? Cheers, Jouni
- [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19 and IANA con… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19 and IANA… Mark Jones