Re: [Dime] [dime] #62 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): SEction 3 needs to be made consistent with DIOC solution

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 24 March 2014 13:46 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <066.eba6aa0bd68b42efe99ac62bc852b2b5@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:46:15 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <092B6AED-F6C5-4B26-9673-6C6636FC6E80@nostrum.com>
References: <066.eba6aa0bd68b42efe99ac62bc852b2b5@trac.tools.ietf.org>
To: dime@ietf.org
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/jq5SLYGRt4LyD0O_n7ySn3jJJ3M
Cc: draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #62 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): SEction 3 needs to be made consistent with DIOC solution
Precedence: list

On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:27 AM, dime issue tracker <trac+dime@grenache.tools.ietf.org> wrote:

> In addition, all normative statements should be moved out of section 3 and
> into a more appropriate section, keeping section 3 an overview section.

I note the new text ends with a normative statement. OTOH, that's a statement concerning other specifications, rather than the protocol itself, so it may be okay.

Ben.

[Dime] [dime] #62 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): SEctio… dime issue tracker
Re: [Dime] [dime] #62 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): SE… Ben Campbell
Re: [Dime] [dime] #62 (draft-ietf-dime-ovli): SEc… dime issue tracker
Re: [Dime] [dime] #62 (draft-ietf-dime-ovli): SEc… dime issue tracker