Re: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 questions #1

The PCC architecture, where agents route based on pre-existing bindings
is another example.

Steve
On 12/2/13 2:04 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote:
> It was my understanding.
>
> Envoyé depuis mon Sony Xperia SP d'Orange
>
> Jouni Korhonen <jounikor@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In Section 2 on Diameter routing it says:
>
>       defined in [RFC6733].  Application level routing specifications
>       that expand on [RFC6733] also exist.
>
> What does this "expand" actually refer to? RFC5729? RFC7075?
>
> - Jouni
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>