Re: [Dime] Ben's suggested change on 8, 1st paragraph

I've added the following after the first paragraph in section 8:

Note: This only applies for DOIC nodes that are not the originator of 
the request.

Steve

On 1/15/15 9:12 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Here we have an example of the need for the term "transaction client" :-)
>
> On a re-read, the text is technically correct, since it speaks of rejecting a Diameter request, vs rejecting some client protocol action. But I think puts too subtle a point on it for a reader who hasn't been involved in all our discussions. I think it would be helpful to point out that this does not apply if the throttling node is the originator of the request in the first place.
>
>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote:
>>
>> Clients can reject requests sent by servers.  I don't see the issue.
>>
>> On 1/15/15 3:59 AM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
>>> Ben wrote:
>>> -- 8, 1st paragraph:
>>>   
>>> This is just for agents and servers, not clients, right? If so, "When a DOIC node..." is too broadly stated.
>>>   
>>> <Ulrich> I agree
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>>
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>