Re: [Dime] [dime] #43: Overstated guidance on session-ending requests.

[Maria Cruz Bartolome <[e-mail]>]

Agreed

From: DiME [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: lunes, 10 de febrero de 2014 18:32
To: Steve Donovan; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #43: Overstated guidance on session-ending requests.

Hi Steve, Ben,

I agree with Steve that we have the text in introduction is clear enough to avoid ambiguity.

Regards,

Lionel

De : DiME [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Steve Donovan
Envoyé : lundi 10 février 2014 18:06
À : [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Objet : Re: [Dime] [dime] #43: Overstated guidance on session-ending requests.

Section 3.1.4 is not normative and says:

The following list of request treatment regarding throttling is provided

as guidelines for application designers when implementing the

Diameter overload control mechanism described in this document.

Exact behavior regarding throttling must be defined per application.
Do you think we need further clarification that application designers should reflect that local policy applies?

Steve
On 2/7/14 3:34 PM, dime issue tracker wrote:

#43: Overstated guidance on session-ending requests.



 In section 3.1.4, under "Intra-Session Requests" indicates that session

 ending requests should be throttled less aggressively. While I agree

 that's a good idea in general, I think that's a mater of local policy, and

 not up to DOIC to specify.



 It would be better to indicate that prioritization under overload is up to

 local policy, and list prioritizing of session-ending requests as an

 example of a potential local policy.




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.