[Dime] Problem with draft-wu-dime-local-keytran
"Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:00 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE80D3A6959 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:00:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.147, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sawga-lYIrpq for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:00:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s37.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s37.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D413A682A for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU137-DS2 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s37.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:01:09 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [131.107.0.74]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU137-DS21174249DD354E73295D993AB0@phx.gbl>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: 'radext mailing list' <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>, dime@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:01:07 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01CA615E.3B77FDA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcphoUk7/yU7tggjQrSam6FoJtYnKw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2009 01:01:09.0405 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A15C4D0:01CA61A1]
Subject: [Dime] Problem with draft-wu-dime-local-keytran
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:00:43 -0000
I have reviewed draft-wu-dime-local-keytran and found an issue with it. The document utilizes an existing RADIUS attribute (EAP-Key-Name) within a Diameter Grouped AVP. According to the value of the EAP-Key-Type AVP, the type of key being sent (and therefore the EAP-Key-Name) will change. Unfortunately, this usage is incompatible with the definition of the EAP-Key-Name in RFC 4072. RFC 4072 Section 4.1.4 notes: The EAP-Key-Name AVP (Radius Attribute Type 102) is of type OctetString. It contains an opaque key identifier (name) generated by the EAP method. Exactly how this name is used depends on the link layer in question, and is beyond the scope of this document (see [EAPKey] for more discussion). As noted in RFC 5247 Section 5.9, the EAP-Key-Name attribute contains the EAP-Session-Id, and followon standards such as IEEE 802.1X-REV depend on this attribute in order to obtain the EAP-Sesssion-Id utilized in subsequent cryptographic calculations. My concerns about this usage include: a. The inclusion of an existing RADIUS attribute within a Diameter Grouped AVP, thereby changing their meaning. The usage of grouping with existing RADIUS attributes has been discussed and rejected in RADEXT as part of the Extended Attributes work, due to concerns about backward compatibility. This document therefore represents an attempt to get around an objection raised in RADEXT via submission of a document in DIME. b. The updating of RFC 5247 by a non-standards track document in a WG that has no charter to revise EAP standards track documents. c. Conflicts between this document and work items on the RADEXT WG charter requested by IEEE 802.1 and referred to in the appendix of IEEE 802.1X-REV.
- [Dime] Problem with draft-wu-dime-local-keytran Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Dime] Problem with draft-wu-dime-local-keytr… Glen Zorn