Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4210)

<lionel.morand@orange.com> Wed, 14 January 2015 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C42F1B2C95 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:57:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kUlQTNKaMrw for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:57:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAA11B2C83 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5947A32423D; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:57:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 2E44B238072; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:57:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:57:27 +0100
From: lionel.morand@orange.com
To: MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN <lionel.morand@orange.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "vf0213@gmail.com" <vf0213@gmail.com>, "jari.arkko@ericsson.com" <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>, "john.loughney@nokia.com" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, "glenzorn@gmail.com" <glenzorn@gmail.com>, "bclaise@cisco.com" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>, "jouni.nospam@gmail.com" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4210)
Thread-Index: AQHQINLSBW5CLwQOE0muYZ1BflrdvJyiIc9ggB2PWDA=
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:57:26 +0000
Message-ID: <21181_1421240249_54B667B9_21181_2808_1_89b0938a-8687-47a5-9c8e-eeabbf73245d@PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20141226061052.C99B318008C@rfc-editor.org> <19574_1419615292_549D9C3C_19574_2784_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36EA6E945@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <19574_1419615292_549D9C3C_19574_2784_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36EA6E945@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.12.22.190922
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/q50Ze8twt1kYbiEeKez9_RDdZuk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:02:29 -0800
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com" <Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4210)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:57:34 -0000

Hi Benoit,

I have already given my view on this errata reported.
But I let others provide additional feedback if required.

Lionel

-----Message d'origine-----
De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de lionel.morand@orange.com
Envoyé : vendredi 26 décembre 2014 18:35
À : RFC Errata System; vf0213@gmail.com; jari.arkko@ericsson.com; john.loughney@nokia.com; glenzorn@gmail.com; bclaise@cisco.com; joelja@bogus.com; jouni.nospam@gmail.com
Cc : dime@ietf.org; Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com
Objet : Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4210)

Diameter is a peer-to-peer protocol and peers are Diameter nodes sharing a Diameter transport connection. Therefore, a "peer" can be either the sender or the receiver of the request, depending on the context.
I don't think that the proposed correction is justified.

regards,

Lionel

-----Message d'origine-----
De : RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
Envoyé : vendredi 26 décembre 2014 07:11 À : vf0213@gmail.com; jari.arkko@ericsson.com; john.loughney@nokia.com; glenzorn@gmail.com; bclaise@cisco.com; joelja@bogus.com; jouni.nospam@gmail.com; MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN Cc : Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com; dime@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Objet : [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4210)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6733, "Diameter Base Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6733&eid=4210

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Hans Liu <Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com>

Section: 5.4.3

Original Text
-------------
   The Disconnect-Cause AVP (AVP Code 273) is of type Enumerated.  A
   Diameter node MUST include this AVP in the Disconnect-Peer-Request
   message to inform the peer of the reason for its intention to shut
   down the transport connection.  The following values are supported:
      REBOOTING                         0
         A scheduled reboot is imminent.  A receiver of a DPR with
         above result code MAY attempt reconnection.
      BUSY                              1
         The peer’s internal resources are constrained, and it has
         determined that the transport connection needs to be closed.
         A receiver of a DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt
         reconnection.
      DO_NOT_WANT_TO_TALK_TO_YOU        2
         The peer has determined that it does not see a need for the
         transport connection to exist, since it does not expect any
         messages to be exchanged in the near future.  A receiver of a
         DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt reconnection.

Corrected Text
--------------
   The Disconnect-Cause AVP (AVP Code 273) is of type Enumerated.  A
   Diameter node MUST include this AVP in the Disconnect-Peer-Request
   message to inform the peer of the reason for its intention to shut
   down the transport connection.  The following values are supported:
      REBOOTING                         0
         A scheduled reboot is imminent.  A receiver of a DPR with
         above result code MAY attempt reconnection.
      BUSY                              1
         The internal resources are constrained, and it has
         determined that the transport connection needs to be closed.
         A receiver of a DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt
         reconnection.
      DO_NOT_WANT_TO_TALK_TO_YOU        2
         The node has determined that it does not see a need for the
         transport connection to exist, since it does not expect any
         messages to be exchanged in the near future.  A receiver of a
         DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt reconnection.

Notes
-----
The "peer" in 1st paragraph represents the receiver. However in the descriptions for cause values the "peer" represents the sender.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6733 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Diameter Base Protocol
Publication Date    : October 2012
Author(s)           : V. Fajardo, Ed., J. Arkko, J. Loughney, G. Zorn, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.