IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Issue#31 status

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CD21A04C1 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:12:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qXtk9Y4iQPid for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5761A0167 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 130.sub-70-196-5.myvzw.com ([70.196.5.130]:1066 helo=[192.168.43.20]) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WGDVH-0006UU-UX for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:12:25 -0800
Message-ID: <53051027.1050608@usdonovans.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:12:23 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3CF7@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3CF7@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030406060603060209040406"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/qHRzw7AFRzw4UTlmxBvjk90fJT8
Subject: Re: [Dime] Issue#31 status
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:12:31 -0000

Agreed

On 2/19/14 8:17 AM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> #31: Sending OC-Ongoing-Throttling-Info AVP in request messages that
> survived a throttling
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> I did not receive much support for the proposal to define an
> OC-Ongoing-Throttling-Info AVP in request messages that survived a
> throttlting.
>  
> However, we seem to agree on some principles:
>  
> Missing OLR in answer means "no change"; it does not mean "no
> overload/no throttling requested"
>  
> Reporting nodes SHOULD include OLR in every answer that it sends in
> response to a request message which indicated OLR_DEFAULT_ALGO support
> unless the reporting node has very good reasons not to do so. Exact
> wording is not yet agreed.
>  
> Ulrich
>  
>  
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email