Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-08: (with COMMENT)
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 24 May 2018 13:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD5812DA4A for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdlDGEHPLHqd for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x232.google.com (mail-ot0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BEC126CB6 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 77-v6so1867995otd.4 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c6URVO5GcvaRZvkUDYL+l4jAiJ+52wZjl5z2vZv2yOY=; b=MQeTr9waAVGloTEtWSzE2tl0tPSdmNF2w9rosRG+v8hbHS5Pav74ZMjqbMdfoCmAHS QSn+oEEO4EADDTEZZ6Pos3fy3azDmFs44PKbBB9xjGEPQNs9M7ejlmWrGIFiE2sNfYxp SnXcu8U2bhUEgDFJ2gaaDCZkO0pNK4aVBulMC2vGn/wcz0SIAdW0foCcUX43owdccBxe Ha2mprfnaQImhF5l0OQoexkz3vbaI1Zxi2P3xvcOhT3XWgXTd3ZxBy/jZiQwv2r9OlYM FzAie3WXiJbPHDJDJv8w2IKNmiM71KvWNbFeQhlIJZxC+8nHgGhhCBp+kga7B1NzJzUt +oYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c6URVO5GcvaRZvkUDYL+l4jAiJ+52wZjl5z2vZv2yOY=; b=irBVytVNvF1kFyoICSRFstDXfsHdR4S5raXubUrqkeQLZw5kpqWa1KUT2JoDLnPgpP zalT2uhjbh+G7Cio83FcOXNIj3VyXurFPDCraUyVSBwuMEZnys+HPvOQKtfp4Bk212b2 DRBJrFUtfk2yzYyGgYgXAEdcGZ04IqZ35kT8C6y+YcIyUh85Dw6qZTB3CPR0IcymbjVH ubvqvrNNMRjOXvM6aYsdI0BFf96ZZfl5/r9dk9SmwYIEW2pscMU9uMfcuceF1KC/1+ok 9iQl4pe/k7ea+ib71I3AGdvPID0+G6wBLGZ801xek9aIupRYfXmDduCQI8OiKQFezDTz rASA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcU1ld+F2QNadmx0FfQ40AXEOqns4x3ZasLJ5p4C/+kW0SqvQFY KziNUVH5O4P4OFMaZ9fJxO4FgxqW9dP0x2AN6/vGow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqwPO+pgoUbLxjK9qnIrXSIMQGvvhqQ6l1Bb2D3U9H7i4vyNcw2gZ1dZtvn1PMXZuUr2gvKRVtxfqM3lAOw6Uw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:719a:: with SMTP id o26-v6mr4985458otj.44.1527167884931; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:ac9:66:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2012436261.4832236.1527143593730@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <152713326803.29850.11203075814656303164.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2012436261.4832236.1527143593730@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 06:17:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPC8ZUOpVEGwYoM=rgsBCngJs=wGtxt2UFwT_tJEzr1Kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yuval Lifshitz <yuvalif@yahoo.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dime-chairs@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004b4927056cf37bad"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/rTxeoCd1WmjmsLz7jEYp0UjtLVg>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 13:18:31 -0000
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Yuval Lifshitz <yuvalif@yahoo.com> wrote: > *inline* > > On Thursday, May 24, 2018, 6:41:17 a.m. GMT+3, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> > wrote: > > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Rich version of this review at: > https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D3353 > > > I only gave this a light read. Some minor comments below. > > COMMENTS > S 1.2. > > deduction of credit from the end user account when service is > > completed and refunding of reserved credit that is not used. > > > > Diameter Credit-control Server A Diameter credit-control server > acts > > as a prepaid server, performing real-time rating and credit- > > control. It is located in the home domain and is accessed by > > a definition of "home domain" would be useful > > *[yuval] base spec define "home realm" we should probably change to that* > > S 2. > > credit-control application. > > > > When an end user requests services such as SIP or messaging, the > > request is typically forwarded to a service element (e.g., SIP > Proxy) > > in the user's home domain. In some cases it might be possible that > > the service element in the visited domain can offer services to the > > also define visited domain, or at least point to a reference. > > *[yuval] base spec defined "local realm" for that. will fix* > > S 3.1. > > [ CC-Correlation-Id ] > > [ User-Equipment-Info ] > > [ User-Equipment-Info-Extension ] > > *[ Proxy-Info ] > > *[ Route-Record ] > > *[ AVP ] > > Please expand AVP on first use. > > *[yuval] it is in the base spec* > I'm sure it is, but you should still expand it. > > S 4. > > control client requests credit authorization from the credit-control > > server prior to allowing any service to be delivered to the end > user. > > > > In the first model, the credit-control server rates the request, > > reserves a suitable amount of money from the user's account, and > > returns the corresponding amount of credit resources. Note that > > Sorry, reserves the balance or the amount reserved? > > *[yuval] not sure what is not clear?* > As I said above, do you return the balance or do you return the amount of credit that has been reserved. > > S 14. > > > > Even without any modification to the messages, an adversary can > > eavesdrop on transactions that contain privacy-sensitive information > > about the user. Also, by monitoring the credit-control messages one > > can collect information about the credit-control server's billing > > models and business relationships. > > I'm having trouble reading these two paragraphs. Are they about what > happens if TLS isn't used? > > *[yuval] will clarify. see here: *https://github.com/ > lbertz02/rfc4006bis/issues/51 > This doesn't seem dramatically clearer. What sort of an adversary can do that? -Ekr > > > > > _______________________________________________ > DiME mailing list > DiME@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >
- [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Yuval Lifshitz
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Yuval Lifshitz
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Yuval Lifshitz
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Yuval Lifshitz
- Re: [Dime] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-… Ben Campbell