Re: [Dime] draft-bertz-dime-rfc4006bis

Thanks for the "RFC4006bis" team for initiating the work. See inline

6/17/2016, 1:04 AM, Yuval Lifshitz kirjoitti:
> Dear group members,
> There are some more modification to RFC4006 that we would like to propose (also listed here: https://github.com/lbertz02/rfc4006bis/issues) that probably require further discussion in the group:
> (1) Update the IPv6 reference

This is straight forward. Just make sure to reference to RFC4291bis work 
in 6MAN (draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis)

> (2) Update the 3GPP charging reference (currently point to rel5...). Here we may want to change that to point to a different doc altogether (3GPP TS 32.299), which is more relevant (and didn't exist at the time)

Here, someone really needs to check that changing the reference (TS and 
release) does not break anything. I would encourage you to come up with 
a short analysis e.g., to Berlin meeting.

> (3) Change the AVP table in page 56-57, by removing the "Encr" and "SHOULD NOT" columns, and the "P" indication (see attached file) - similarly to the change made in RFC6733

This should be straigh forward. To my understanding no implementation 
follows the 'encr' recommendation in practise. Correct?

> (4) Upgrade Restriction-Filter-Rule AVP to also support RFC 5777

Again here some effort needs to be put to analyze backward compatibility 
is maintained if we touch Restriction-Filter-Rule AVP. I would encourage 
you to come up with a short analysis e.g., to Berlin meeting.

Also, I'll add (5) Credit-Control-Answer when 'E' is set. Check that the 
command is aligned with RFC6733 regarding the error replies.

- Jouni

>
> Appreciate your feedback!
>
> Yuval
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>