Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt

<lionel.morand@orange.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED7F21F8629 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I++lZetziiT5 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3363F21F8627 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A8E0C2DC313; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:40:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 7C20027C053; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:40:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:40:46 +0200
From: lionel.morand@orange.com
To: "dieter.jacobsohn@telekom.de" <dieter.jacobsohn@telekom.de>, "bclaise@cisco.com" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNXqrfDWh2uHmaRUu3IaSVjMoIhJcjJfCAgABjUwCAAAWlAIAAIggA
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:40:36 +0000
Message-ID: <8802_1341992449_4FFD2E01_8802_151_3_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E02724A@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <4FFC405F.9030508@cisco.com> <15719_1341962331_4FFCB85B_15719_4173_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E027152@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <4FFD2694.2040704@cisco.com> <1836CE1BA4F81F46921CA0334F7E427457FF4C62C1@HE113456.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
In-Reply-To: <1836CE1BA4F81F46921CA0334F7E427457FF4C62C1@HE113456.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E02724APEXCVZYM13corpora_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.6.19.115414
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:40:47 -0000

Hi,

Benoit, it is true that there is in the RFC4005 an implicit reference to the RFC3588 when describing the new command (AAR/AAA). It could be useful to explicitly state that the definition of the new command follows the rules described in RFC3588(bis).

About Dieter's comment, the CCF specification of a command is clearly defined in RFC3588(bis) with an explicit reference to RFC5234 for further details, so I don't think that it is needed to provide again the description in this specification and in any other diameter specification referencing the RFC3588(bis).

Regards,

Lionel

De : dieter.jacobsohn@telekom.de [mailto:dieter.jacobsohn@telekom.de]
Envoyé : mercredi 11 juillet 2012 09:29
À : bclaise@cisco.com; MORAND Lionel RD-CORE
Cc : dime@ietf.org
Objet : AW: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt

Hello Benoit and Lionel
as a reader of the Diameter specifications I would support a proposal to define the notification within the document. Clearly "somewhere" it is stated but for a simple reader it would be very helpful to have such an description of the notification in the same document as it is used.


Best regards

Dieter Jacobsohn


Deutsche Telekom AG
Group Technology
Dieter Jacobsohn
Landgrabenweg 151, 53227 Bonn
+49 228 936-18445 (Tel.)
+49 391 5801 46624 (Fax)
+49 171 2088 710 (Mobil)
E-Mail: dieter.jacobsohn@telekom.de<mailto:dieter.jacobsohn@telekom.de>
www.telekom.com<http://www.telekom.com/>

Erleben, was verbindet.

Deutsche Telekom AG
Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender)
Vorstand: René Obermann (Vorsitzender),
Dr. Manfred Balz, Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme,
Timotheus Höttges, Claudia Nemat,  Prof. Dr. Marion Schick
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794
Sitz der Gesellschaft Bonn
USt-IdNr. DE 123475223

Große Veränderungen fangen klein an - Ressourcen schonen und nicht jede E-Mail drucken.


________________________________
Von: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Benoit Claise
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2012 09:09
An: lionel.morand@orange.com
Cc: dime mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt
Hi Lionel,

Hi Benoit,



- I could not find the meaning of * in, for example,



                          [ CHAP-Auth ]

                          [ CHAP-Challenge ]

                        * [ Framed-Compression ]

                          [ Framed-Interface-Id ]

                          [ Framed-IP-Address ]

                        * [ Framed-IPv6-Prefix ]

                          [ Framed-IP-Netmask ]

                          [ Framed-MTU ]

                          [ Framed-Protocol ]

                          [ ARAP-Password ]

                          [ ARAP-Security ]

                        * [ ARAP-Security-Data ]

                        * [ Login-IP-Host ]

                        * [ Login-IPv6-Host ]

                          [ Login-LAT-Group ]

                          [ Login-LAT-Node ]

                          [ Login-LAT-Port ]

                          [ Login-LAT-Service ]

                        * [ Tunneling ]

                        * [ Proxy-Info ]

                        * [ Route-Record ]

                        * [ AVP ]

[[LM]] the « * » in front the AVP means that 0, 1 or more AVP scan be present in the request (or in a Grouped AVP). It follows rules used in RFC3588 and defined in RFC 5234 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234#section-3.6).


BC> Thanks for the education.
Is this so obvious to the Diameter readers, including the newcomers, that we don't need to mention it?
In other words, am I the only one NOT knowing this? ;-)

Regards, Benoit.



Regards,



Lionel

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.