[Dime] Significance of Result-Code in DWA

Priyank Luthra <priyank.luthra@gmail.com> Wed, 15 May 2013 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <priyank.luthra@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063E621F8F12 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YbVMQbG1-W1j for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x234.google.com (mail-ia0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936D321F8F0E for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l27so1920806iae.11 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0y8kYywxbL5xxMJAP1zuNJ5kieh45Zfg0gLduIZky1Q=; b=eXh2lEHB5Uaks5DeRlQGx6wm6v99ViJ9lycsmwX14xDGO73xQ+eWvH61Imakbch097 Lhki/U89Cjs/ur+j3PaEhZf4Z1dAi5VpErFD2ETvnZqV6IjfsrictWOlszDMHrM2AC8j Y6gwS70QNuMWqenPheWB47EJG+RC8Muz3TNUE5i1Ytl7SAKDiGiHvnyXc6Zmc3OrH6Gp rW7W329LyN2KgpMMZICMw3lCX+NYYHNqAHnRvBGRu8RpU6YfjTzyC22IEtVSoHKuPHUz RcYKTzU/5CgK9zn+ipotBRB36ZcuzugUz6ihf9rmYrHa1aVgXs/j2GbUKjZuXrdMzMua UNWA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.101.4 with SMTP id fc4mr5004497igb.10.1368612180143; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.250.3 with HTTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:33:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CALUznxbPO4ohH9Lae0nERY2r88pEKomNax2zDE5FNqBA=KRUDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Priyank Luthra <priyank.luthra@gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6b5bcd5387a04dcbeda00"
Subject: [Dime] Significance of Result-Code in DWA
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:03:01 -0000

Hi,

I wanted to know if there is any significance of Result-Code AVP in DWA
(Device-watchdog-answer).
What would be the use case where a failed response (eg. 5012) is sent in
the DWA ?

In that case will the server teer down the transport connection or send DPR
?
Or should the server consider DWA with any result-code as a
valid scenario and assume that the peer is active.



-- 
Regards,
Priyank