Re: [Dime] [dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28351A0218 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:54:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aaq9mQn6zd0z for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F2B1A0217 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:53740 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WDvoN-0004cn-It for dime@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:54:40 -0800
Message-ID: <52FCC094.8030406@usdonovans.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:54:44 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <075.fdee2d1220a4dd797b0b12767aebd1cf@trac.tools.ietf.org> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B92097740BB@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se> <D62D012E-2BDD-42A9-90A5-5E9461E7BF8B@gmail.com> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B92097745AF@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B92097745AF@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080809030501000708010408"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:54:44 -0000

+1
On 2/12/14 7:34 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome wrote:
> Thanks Jouni, I didn't realize.
> One more correction added
>
>> Proposal:
>> Indicates that the reporting node urges the reacting node to reduce 
>> its traffic by a given percentage. For example if the
>> reacting node would send 100 packets to the				<---
>> reporting node, then a reception of OC-Reduction-Percentage value of 
>> 10 would mean that from now on the reacting node MUST only send
>> 90 packets instead of 100. How the reacting node achieves the "true       <---
>> reduction" transactions leading to the sent request messages is up to 
>> the implementation. The reacting node MAY simply drop every 10th 
>> packet from its output queue and let the generic application logic try 
>> to recover from it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com] 
> Sent: miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2014 10:36
> To: Maria Cruz Bartolome
> Cc: dime@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history
>
>
> Fine by me.. though you then need to apply the same change to the rest of this paragraph, not only the first one.
>
> Also, please update this additional concern into the issue tracker issue #52.
>
> - Jouni
>
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> Same comment also applies to following paragraph in 5.5.2
>>
>> Now:
>>   0 < value < 100
>>
>>      Indicates that the reporting node urges the reacting node to
>>      reduce its traffic by a given percentage.  For example if the
>>      reacting node has been sending 100 packets per second to the
>>      reporting node, then a reception of OC-Reduction-Percentage value
>>      of 10 would mean that from now on the reacting node MUST only send
>>      90 packets per second.  How the reacting node achieves the "true
>>      reduction" transactions leading to the sent request messages is up
>>      to the implementation.  The reacting node MAY simply drop every
>>      10th packet from its output queue and let the generic application
>>      logic try to recover from it.0 < value < 100
>>
>> Proposal:
>> Indicates that the reporting node urges the reacting node to reduce 
>> its traffic by a given percentage. For example if the
>> reacting node would send 100 packets to the				<---
>> reporting node, then a reception of OC-Reduction-Percentage value of 
>> 10 would mean that from now on the reacting node MUST only send
>> 90 packets per second. How the reacting node achieves the "true 
>> reduction" transactions leading to the sent request messages is up to 
>> the implementation. The reacting node MAY simply drop every 10th 
>> packet from its output queue and let the generic application logic try 
>> to recover from it.
>>
>>
>> We should not specify a rates for the simple loss algorithm. It's up to the implementation how to reduce, but no time unit has to be specified. 
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dime issue tracker [mailto:trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org]
>> Sent: miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2014 9:13
>> To: Maria Cruz Bartolome
>> Cc: dime@ietf.org
>> Subject: [dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous 
>> history
>>
>> #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history
>>
>> Now (chapter 4.7):
>>    The OC-Reduction-Percentage AVP (AVP code TBD8) is type of Unsigned32
>>    and describes the percentage of the traffic that the sender is
>>    requested to reduce, compared to what it otherwise would have sent.
>>
>> Proposal:
>> The OC-Reduction-Percentage AVP (AVP code TBD8) is type of Unsigned32  and describes the percentage of the traffic that the sender is  requested to reduce, compared to what it otherwise would send.
>>
>>
>> The intention is to avoid that anyone may interpret reacting node is  required to consider history of sent information when throttling.
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------+----------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------+--
>> -----------------------------------------------+---
>> Reporter:  maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com  |      Owner:  MCruz
>>     Type:  defect                             |  Bartolomé
>> Priority:  major                              |     Status:  new
>> Component:  draft-docdt-dime-ovli              |  Milestone:
>> Severity:  Active WG Document                 |    Version:  1.0
>>                                               |   Keywords:
>> -----------------------------------------------+----------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------+--
>> -----------------------------------------------+---
>>
>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/52>
>> dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>