IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-08.txt

Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu> Tue, 14 March 2017 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EBD129582 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpT3WkcaiUEo for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65C8126D73 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E294C10215F; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:16:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmAVlQdf05s7; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:16:29 +0100 (CET)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCB1102158; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:16:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.40]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:16:21 +0100
From: Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
To: Misha Zaytsev <misha.zaytsev.rus@gmail.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "mark@azu.ca" <mark@azu.ca>, "ext lionel.morand@orange.com" <lionel.morand@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-08.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSnD9Yu5eDhnY/U0275LFxBv55ZaGT/uqAgABAtIA=
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:16:20 +0000
Message-ID: <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26DAF0C1649@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <148943989559.20337.4822755871711788913@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABPQr26R6SDvTA9W7aqcp9XA2jqs4m6B_eAFRk5joiC7snz=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABPQr26R6SDvTA9W7aqcp9XA2jqs4m6B_eAFRk5joiC7snz=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.6.170]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26DAF0C1649PALLENEofficehd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/tehUhsotgO2LILFUo7giruE-gZ0>
Subject: Re: [Dime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:16:34 -0000

Hi Misha,

the draft specifies how to assign sessions to session groups, correct. It also specifies how to
apply a command (request/response) to a session group. In case the group holds 10 sessions,
Diameter peers exchange only a single instead of 10 commands, hence can help to reduce
signaling load between Diameter peers.

I hope that clarifies your question.

marco

From: Misha Zaytsev [mailto:misha.zaytsev.rus@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2017 10:20
To: dime@ietf.org; Marco Liebsch; mark@azu.ca; ext lionel.morand@orange.com
Subject: Re: [Dime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-08.txt

Hi All,
Am I right saying that the intention of this draft is to logically group multiple sessions?
And there is no aim to physically bundle several session-related requests/answers into one?
If so, this approach may decrease processing on communicating nodes (but that will depend on implementation), but will not "reduce signaling" among the involved parties.
Please clarify this point?
Thanks a lot in advance!
/Misha

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email