[Dime] RE : Re: Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

<lionel.morand@orange.com> Thu, 05 May 2016 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C526112D72F; Thu, 5 May 2016 06:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C3SZ8i6cUGXA; Thu, 5 May 2016 06:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BCA812D7BC; Thu, 5 May 2016 06:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id C4D0A3B4701; Thu, 5 May 2016 15:51:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown []) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 9A8F623805E; Thu, 5 May 2016 15:51:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::ec23:902:c31f:731c]) by OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Thu, 5 May 2016 15:51:00 +0200
From: lionel.morand@orange.com
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Thread-Topic: RE : Re: [Dime] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRptUnEAX650Tv60KLf3sYDPxX4g==
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 13:50:59 +0000
Message-ID: <1881_1462456260_572B4FC4_1881_11748_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01E54905@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20160503213139.8362.8871.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8354_1462318968_57293778_8354_15408_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01E4C8AE@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <572A1C14.5020907@usdonovans.com> <74A5239A-329E-4F82-9FBF-497C9D906E89@cooperw.in> <572A4520.5090101@cs.tcd.ie> <90C95598-F68D-4F94-8AE3-FAFF403F560E@cooperw.in> <572AFD9D.7010909@cs.tcd.ie> <CF2919CA-DE13-44C1-8430-DD5B8D8DB252@cooperw.in>, <572B48D2.6090801@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <572B48D2.6090801@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01E54905OPEXCLILM43corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version:, Antispam-Engine:, Antispam-Data: 2016.5.5.131517
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/tkXUQfsI1MHXdCanxq3iGX3HkfY>
Cc: "dime-chairs@ietf.org" <dime-chairs@ietf.org>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org>
Subject: [Dime] RE : Re: Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 13:52:55 -0000

Was also my proposal. Fine for me.

Envoyé de mon Orange Nura 2

Le 5 mai 2016 15:22, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> a écrit :

On 05/05/16 14:19, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> I think the gap is in Section 5, where it should be noted that in
> order for priority information to be reliably usable in the way that
> use cases 5.1 and 5.2 call for, the Diameter nodes sending and
> consuming it must have pre-established trust relationships of the
> sort described in Section 11.

Sounds reasonable to me. Authors?



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.