IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels

"DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <md3135@att.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88871A8AA4 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fu5pVp9WlS2z for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60431A8AA5 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049459.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t8UKcnvf002032; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:39:53 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1x8eyf4p71-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:39:53 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8UKdqUw010995; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:39:53 -0400
Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8UKdlKp010911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:39:50 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:39:31 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.2.4]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:39:31 -0400
From: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
Thread-Index: AQHQ+7/9rJF0RiKFeUmgaN+GamRGwp5ViKUw
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:39:30 +0000
Message-ID: <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365615C07483@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <20150930202736.3FFF61A8A56@ietfa.amsl.com> <560C4841.2090005@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <560C4841.2090005@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.173.37]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365615C07483MISOUT7MSGUSRDB_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-09-30_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1509300251
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/uPp-A0zA0TSut1NixJEI46z4Jf4>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:39:56 -0000

Me as well

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Donovan
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:38 PM
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels

I'm okay with Jay's proposal on not specifying a default value.

Steve
On 9/30/15 3:27 PM, Lee, Jay wrote:
Hi Steve and all,

For the first proposal, as I indicated, I support increasing the number of priority levels up to 16.

I am also fine with the second proposal. My question is: do we need to mandate this feature, as individual operators have different situations? Perhaps some flexibility should be allowed? Instead of mandating it, we can include the statement that when there is no DRMP AVP, this correspond to 'normal traffic' without a particular high or low priority. Then each operator can map this default to a value (e.g., 8 or something else) that they feel appropriate.

Thanks,

Jay




_______________________________________________

DiME mailing list

DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status