Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92CA1ADEA6 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:50:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AW8kw3KcHI1s for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x234.google.com (mail-bk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587AE1ADF0F for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u14so2509880bkz.25 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:50:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ULb5gcRPsVCT9aO1qfV07g5u4ebUJqsC/X9KS5fzjec=; b=fROeMtS+GCV39rubu4wULxaHQFMBBwXtfp1wT69BePLYutl5NprityNwon9Kd096en xltu8+Cnd7x9h3si87bNqrfTSVQ0CiCd/WTGjGnKR/Bi7Dhq+OR/muaaEALqUxtSXrdt JDA9wM+gyWCMUu8hx8wkgvLY0kuVjcoXeFQRbjDHMyA8ionUji7C6bw8ZPOQznZ9Y7Al puekSzqttzP42uEXj77ggZaoxcVIbSMn5y2yV6Qqjfuw+GyjbbUSl9Ds7sSabpapW+gW B0j5EOBt/wreu0KX0K4QKe3tMBcITooSc4aFpGHZUuEmdPqt8rje7ZiwjVeWujP2wk+1 c1Jw==
X-Received: by 10.205.20.132 with SMTP id qo4mr74087bkb.110.1387230637003; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:50:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:71c6:4907:507a:5262? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:71c6:4907:507a:5262]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xm9sm11635258bkb.1.2013.12.16.13.50.36 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C592D376-89C5-4D0F-8549-6CE1B8698396@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 23:50:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C29F85B5-80ED-44D7-8B11-59BC64FE796B@gmail.com>
References: <70089680-BBFD-4E4C-B550-30FEAB5C611C@gmail.com> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920975651D@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se> <C592D376-89C5-4D0F-8549-6CE1B8698396@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:50:41 -0000

On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> I agree with submitting 01. 
> 
> I disagree about removing controversial text, although I don't mind marking it as controversial. But I think it would be a better approach would be to take 01 as a baseline and start putting open issues in the issue tracker.

+1 

Issue tracker would make this stuff somewhat more manageable.. and since we got a WG doc, issue tracker works just fine.

- Jouni


> 
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Jouni, all,
>> 
>> We got some open discussion without any conclusion yet, if you prefer to publish .01 version, I would suggest these open issues are properly covered there, or all related text is omitted.
>> Cheers
>> /MCruz
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
>> Sent: lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 17:47
>> To: dime@ietf.org list
>> Subject: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
>> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> I am somewhat tempted to publish -01 even if we still have some very rough edges and then continue from there. Any strong disagreements?
>> 
>> The place we lack text more or less entirely is Section 5.5.3. (for a reason) but will type in something later tonight (or so).
>> 
>> - Jouni
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>