[Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC6733 (3805)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 09 December 2013 08:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FBB1ADF10; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:54:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E3p6GKHDz29C; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9126B1ADEDC; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E1DFA7FC15B; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:54:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Lionel.morand@orange.com, vf0213@gmail.com, jari.arkko@ericsson.com, john.loughney@nokia.com, glenzorn@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131209085448.E1DFA7FC15B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:54:48 -0800
Cc: dime@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC6733 (3805)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:54:55 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6733, "Diameter Base Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6733&eid=3805 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Lionel <Lionel.morand@orange.com> Date Reported: 2013-11-18 Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Message Length The Message Length field is three octets and indicates the length of the Diameter message including the header fields and the padded AVPs. Thus, the Message Length field is always a multiple of 4. Corrected Text -------------- Message Length The Message Length field is three octets and indicates the number of octets of the Diameter message, including the header fields and the padded AVPs. Thus, the Message Length field is always a multiple of 4 octets. Notes ----- the actual text does not indicate the unit of length unit, which may lead to confusion and IOT issues, especially if someone considers bits instead of bytes. -------------------------------------- RFC6733 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Base Protocol Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : V. Fajardo, Ed., J. Arkko, J. Loughney, G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Dime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6733 (3805) RFC Errata System
- [Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC6733 (3805) RFC Errata System