Re: [Dime] [dime] #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46311A0218 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:46:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DcPbFGjL8TjD for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DA71A0217 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:53730 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WDvgO-0006En-9O for dime@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:46:31 -0800
Message-ID: <52FCBEA4.3020000@usdonovans.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:46:28 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <075.72da31b401c033905a4fb81d09a8b4aa@trac.tools.ietf.org> <7077_1392216348_52FB891B_7077_4146_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E49E1A4@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <E194C2E18676714DACA9C3A2516265D2026649A3@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <EE7D3FEB-CD2A-45D9-9700-5CCA118D9A14@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE7D3FEB-CD2A-45D9-9700-5CCA118D9A14@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060301000700010408020805"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:46:35 -0000

Jouni,

Which optimization, defining a default value or Lionel's proposal to
make it a required AVP?

Steve

On 2/13/14 6:05 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Agree that it is a small optimization, which I put there
> because at the beginning there seemed to be a lot of worry
> on every extra AVP ;-)
>
> I prefer having the AVP optional but with a default value
> just like it is now. We have the same for the reduction
> percentage and the validity time as well.
>
> - Jouni
>
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:55 AM, "TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)" <jean-jacques.trottin@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mcruz
>>
>> The current description indicates that when not present the OLR is of type Host, which was fine for me and keeps my preference. 
>> We may have  deployments where Realm OLR is not used, or where statistically the HOST type is the most frequent, so to have the grouped OLR-AVP containing a minimum of AVPs minimizes parsing. I agree it is a small optimization.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> JJacques 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de lionel.morand@orange.com
>> Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 15:46
>> À : dime@ietf.org; maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com
>> Objet : Re: [Dime] [dime] #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP
>>
>> Hi Maria Cruz,
>>
>> I'm assuming that you mean "required" instead of "mandatory", right?
>>
>> So instead of:
>>
>>   OC-OLR ::= < AVP Header: TBD2 >
>>              < OC-Sequence-Number >
>>              [ OC-Report-Type ]
>>              [ OC-Reduction-Percentage ]
>>              [ OC-Validity-Duration ]
>>            * [ AVP ]
>>
>> You would prefer:
>>
>>   OC-OLR ::= < AVP Header: TBD2 >
>>              < OC-Sequence-Number >
>>              { OC-Report-Type }
>>              [ OC-Reduction-Percentage ]
>>              [ OC-Validity-Duration ]
>>            * [ AVP ]
>>
>> And I'm fine with this proposal.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Lionel
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de dime issue tracker Envoyé : mercredi 12 février 2014 15:26 À : maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com Cc : dime@ietf.org Objet : [Dime] [dime] #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP
>>
>> #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP
>>
>> Now in chapter 4.6:
>>
>>    The default value of the OC-Report-Type AVP is 0 (i.e. the host
>>    report).
>>
>> This AVP is always required, right? Then, I think it is more precise that  we define this AVP as mandatory.
>>
>> -- 
>> -----------------------------------------------+------------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------+---
>> Reporter:  maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com  |      Owner:  MCruz
>>     Type:  defect                             |  Bartolomé
>> Priority:  major                              |     Status:  new
>> Component:  draft-docdt-dime-ovli              |  Milestone:
>> Severity:  Active WG Document                 |    Version:  1.0
>>                                               |   Keywords:
>> -----------------------------------------------+------------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------+---
>>
>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/54>
>> dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>