Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 18 July 2016 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3441412D6B8 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7uCmMAsZ3NQP for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com (mail-pf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4689612D7E7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id p64so28372797pfb.1 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4VI4/hoKtVXGrYJTnkUhPZa1X5W0yGPJ/wCvU24xXg4=; b=cIABJRCs74hDIJJK3ZVUTbEr7SMGIXxlJacKYhBtqpMIw/xgXH4Qq08cP1Dze5GyR8 o0K1DNjoqb5LQ0FI1Wuo1icx6/Kj+U3V1UBguWTffrjEpeMUkFcDnLJ7RlMiMfARo0QS wVrR+wY+kUQMBSv5EGoxdJI4MY1XLSZbWkdsIuyf3oMY2onmxzbifo+IIRFh8PVJaSuo iKIDHsv3n82GdPbL6wOhG7mMr7EGFw8ON31tyqzrklzKyAdDsDCsSNJ8jhgroCFdTdZr YhCVY2JJ0dVNhaYYwhHJ70khzKq+cRVa5xzicN0gZUDoTSzxZJrKQkFzLdmL0omC+5Xg Gp/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4VI4/hoKtVXGrYJTnkUhPZa1X5W0yGPJ/wCvU24xXg4=; b=e7DHLOis6WrGWPdOMbTdQ/BARjsIyZxD6jnF3dnBlV4VsLTqOCdsQl0W7i03Svujtq jw7JffJo1ZnG86oBgIlvwyWWAlqonNJeioQWr0I/IeIhY/oBv6yNGLTl4OHdFA217Xbg s9VK49HW5TPmvXSWZbWjfEWc+h8JyvFsSI3crzGv1Udky7R2YAWvRh6ojy54VzUoqsKw GMV6B06646YRs8Ijr5UaZjUjZzAFgA2umUe3gzWlq2+TbxyL1rroNJWwUxZye11sA98x vjz6+y2vReLrTlsyk3yzXocdzeYP5OOZ519Yedyp80Ms8X3Tuohs3wqQOC8b1ox1tihg T14Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL8qYarwq2XrJ+VqlVJdTEuM0O35YCgdM+9BpJHGG0TdVnrTQtrKQr696d0zGiKgA==
X-Received: by 10.98.11.86 with SMTP id t83mr44483628pfi.51.1468834930288; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.240.251.90] ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id yt4sm2914874pab.26.2016.07.18.02.42.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
References: <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE4930CA31D9@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE4930CA5EC0@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com>
To: Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshitz@sandvine.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <747c3ab4-0aef-0f9f-1f33-8ab899385f07@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:42:06 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C43C255C7106314F8D13D03FA20CFE4930CA5EC0@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/w12UO2M7cQik50qjQG1o_5ePg5o>
Subject: Re: [Dime] slide for RFC4006bis discussion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:46:25 -0000

Quick notes.. for the IPv6 redirect address you should reference to 
rfc5952.

To make this properly, I think you should comform with all possible ways 
to write the addresses (specifically the zero compression stuff). 
However, I am also fine limiting the options to two as it leaves less 
room for incompatabililty issues ;)

- Jouni

7/18/2016, 2:14 AM, Yuval Lifshitz kirjoitti:
> Thanks for the comments. Updated slides 3 and 4.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuval Lifshitz
> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2016 10:52 PM
> To: dime@ietf.org
> Cc: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] (Lyle.T.Bertz@sprint.com); Dave Dolson; Lionel.morand@orange.com; Jouni.nosmap (jouni.nospam@gmail.com); Yuval Lifshitz
> Subject: slide for RFC4006bis discussion
>
> Dear group,
> Attached slides for the RFC4006bis discussion. Please let me know if you want more topics to be added.
>
> Regards,
>
> Yuval
>