Re: [Dime] Pending action points after IETF 94
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 09 March 2016 16:42 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF7E12D7BD for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:42:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmtFr_bHtUdb for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9DF12D7B9 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n5so6676650pfn.2 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:42:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PGOKNlTbpfUAbmP5HmsRPIkh7YWzRbqEOKSDKfFYaPs=; b=EagjH52Rk2nDqHxx0KBo82eP8/UwPF0ax6cny/zNrVu2QTPFrwDCJ0APVM6kdQiAnP hJgFAW0Ei652r0GsJxBWZP7CcuBPJNU+tc6fWIkbcfUv/pW8cltvRLJQzHwcIb61UEv/ KSQJKHnxXBiyI/CaMMNKCeD7CpE1j35fC+X53ogLtqFr5pNz/XoGSYF/M9DAzVmNNT2X 518f/n2rtkNqTrQ64IculmKMot/0Ot26QnquA/OIDdKYyTMoeoBiQwbJj1K/h8NR/5T/ afjFkHGRSiL/lYyEqIUkBzsiqLU8QzNZ34pUc7ZwrucSZi/3Ib+6XfEQy3heds8w580S T8UA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PGOKNlTbpfUAbmP5HmsRPIkh7YWzRbqEOKSDKfFYaPs=; b=W3fmRYqMGKE+sjpS8XP4iyTsgOCMKYjLt9BhHq4WdHrnJ5BBmpLQkxmaVmj5oI+YkN F04xHYVmXR6KpUBcR37PHbzbZmvSjzdpZbnpbrRXMiQn9048SMtOwek59cKmjDnG9mp+ 6ZLc7s10U8ygbgLjp35MthvRKQoiZV7c9Nlz8ZzYld2p1Csvblm59sIo1iY3RltnXKv5 bKClgt16iVPVy5PUMy9RCrmVRFa+4mj2FU61at0IywJ6HJ1SNnLGFuu/cYka6rJdtyVT +M3zAn5M42nCJGYm8NijFUummB5dqj44/YNJNgQdzQkc3z922XSe5ks87mbF8NRwxUUK 5YwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLYbCP6YRP0J7VSuPqk8ZsPyRLZJZgWzj1SY4+ZkrJMKypaIc34wDmmnvEDZ9k1RQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.13.88 with SMTP id v85mr29188344pfi.150.1457541752063; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.65.94] ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n68sm13554613pfj.46.2016.03.09.08.42.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:42:31 -0800 (PST)
To: lionel.morand@orange.com, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
References: <24132_1457516790_56DFF0F6_24132_8180_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01DFACB6@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56E05276.6040805@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:42:30 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24132_1457516790_56DFF0F6_24132_8180_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01DFACB6@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/wUHWHNM4ubm1z5VIYBQuLK-EkMM>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Pending action points after IETF 94
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:42:34 -0000
'ello, Just to point out that I resurrected an old draft. There was this presentation a long ago about the basic principles: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-dime-7.pdf I have not spent any time to implement any of the already proposed 'enhancements' like using CBOR instead of JSON, COSE etc.. - JOuni > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Diameter AVP Level Security (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-korhonen-dime-e2e-security/ ) has been resuscitated by Jouni. Please review the document and provide comments, taking into account the E2E security requirements. It will be discussed at the next IETF meeting >
- [Dime] Pending action points after IETF 94 lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] Pending action points after IETF 94 Jouni Korhonen