Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01

+1
On 12/16/13 3:50 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with submitting 01. 
>>
>> I disagree about removing controversial text, although I don't mind marking it as controversial. But I think it would be a better approach would be to take 01 as a baseline and start putting open issues in the issue tracker.
> +1 
>
> Issue tracker would make this stuff somewhat more manageable.. and since we got a WG doc, issue tracker works just fine.
>
> - Jouni
>
>
>> On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Jouni, all,
>>>
>>> We got some open discussion without any conclusion yet, if you prefer to publish .01 version, I would suggest these open issues are properly covered there, or all related text is omitted.
>>> Cheers
>>> /MCruz
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
>>> Sent: lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 17:47
>>> To: dime@ietf.org list
>>> Subject: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I am somewhat tempted to publish -01 even if we still have some very rough edges and then continue from there. Any strong disagreements?
>>>
>>> The place we lack text more or less entirely is Section 5.5.3. (for a reason) but will type in something later tonight (or so).
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>