IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels

Jay Lee <paperpony@gmail.com> Thu, 24 September 2015 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <paperpony@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4138B1A8866 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwCWBl2KeO-s for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D694A1A885F for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkgd64 with SMTP id d64so43582247vkg.0 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XAGMHNPhJZR/RN/d/khv8ZIlM8citwvuEGBFRecegiQ=; b=zkIYzjgUWWjvOho/MKAu9RsVONdFx3zpewqEytVNZpHd5co1jMEqLLulCrTeX5TrNB nJpT4FVq6YUsmS4OWKc49/LoMbuIW7OynBQKvM4HdgEvpxBEV4Naa6zU1SBXDZ8Jip98 9ocJZ+LmB+x4sKfaxwpiiheqOJHqFY3Vp2mjYenZJ1AynVm7mWHg+C8ubVt1Sx888d4B jlH1ukM4o6cQreN+p6HUa5GB7GlkTgaaRGeD6LOK6W6drWPOxpif6J/WUzKz/X0GRGH7 UhBurP4aBDBjPBT1Qbf1jgBPEX5p3b8mdbqbKu209klfcgI2CYNawW5ksS/ES+7+6di8 smRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.108.91 with SMTP id h88mr750758vkc.57.1443123346972; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.13.205 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMNyoFk-BP=kvM+XLVWTVaT1jwZC-LuYh2PEUf1Ja526FGyjwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jay Lee <paperpony@gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11478f4476a246052083561c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/xKw3hSuW6ypcsiwmz3k55fCxZ24>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:53:26 -0700
Subject: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 19:51:33 -0000

Hi all,



Verizon supports JJacques’s proposal on extending range of priority levels
up to 16. We prefer having have 7-8 priority levels, and also having
another 8 priority levels for future us, so 16 priority levels are fine
with us.




Thanks,



Jay

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status