IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Tue, 25 March 2014 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27C91A0245 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.58
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dxkaCaZB6ny for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.209.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644B41A0248 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:60272 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WSYNK-0007fg-R4 for dime@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:55:12 -0700
Message-ID: <5331ED2E.4030507@usdonovans.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:55:10 -0500
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060306090203070507030901"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/yiMT0jRX89rzmjI541RW8zdJklQ
Subject: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:55:15 -0000

All,

Given that we do not have consensus on removing Realm-Routed-Request
reports, I propose that we resolve issue 23 by renaming what is called
Realm reports in the -01 draft to Realm-Routed-Reports in the -02 draft.

I will update the issue with the text changes when I make them, but I
will do nothing but change the name and make the wording consistent in
that Realm-Routed-Reports apply to requests sent to the realm that do
not have a Destination-Host AVP.

Regards,

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email