Re: [Dime] RE : Re: AW: unexpected consequence of deprecating E2E security in RFC 3588 bis

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Mon, 01 October 2012 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8A021F8514 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RIQhnufNBMaD for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6255021F84F1 for <dime@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbro8 with SMTP id ro8so7303342pbb.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8yq6JHOcsgbt8elKu61wlhj/YIhHbDd9Mpy5aP0DHx0=; b=cHKeOzykiBzPjKE8UjCKv4flS8+mt4QMXQNZVCgZhAKKmQp7ykFvY4do/bF9WAptMD NSpvCVjCwo241x5lo2V8V+VrLUxO1baB/unpnaTYMX3VQECXRB/tRllbbpmozElAAhhe dtIwQuJw9WUZX+sj0LQgQqI1VS0yI+6TiHNRQnRxVyGkXVl5RKSYW6KLmcNOUeUC960J iaBysFXibGogDP3EUp3WA0+jnGJ2Sl6v1UYBPothCdF8DNPpb0pRcyaxYnB+CTJ7N63x nCz42aP1LHcjzC8z8HuYznO42UjxQk/vjkJp+DhPwGu4eUGnSCa60f6d0niTfEyTD60o wMEQ==
Received: by 10.68.218.101 with SMTP id pf5mr37832102pbc.60.1349062354132; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ppp-124-120-131-31.revip2.asianet.co.th. [124.120.131.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm9653899paz.11.2012.09.30.20.32.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50690ECD.5090002@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:32:29 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120914 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lionel.morand@orange.com
References: <5062DD0C.2080300@gmail.com> <27169_1348684002_506348E2_27169_14408_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E074A1A@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5063CEC3.9080305@gmail.com> <1836CE1BA4F81F46921CA0334F7E4274583123AEA0@HE113456.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <5064329D.40203@gmail.com> <20096_1348913297_5066C891_20096_2169_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0758C4@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5066CB47.1070807@gmail.com> <19603_1348915144_5066CFC8_19603_1305_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0758E2@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>, <5066EA99.3020801@gmail.com> <26184_1349003712_506829C0_26184_9758_1_tTKzDPgZM1TV@TJw0VVKN>
In-Reply-To: <26184_1349003712_506829C0_26184_9758_1_tTKzDPgZM1TV@TJw0VVKN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis@tools.ietf.org>, "Stefan.Schroeder06@telekom.de" <Stefan.Schroeder06@telekom.de>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "turners@ieca.com" <turners@ieca.com>, "stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Dime] RE : Re: AW: unexpected consequence of deprecating E2E security in RFC 3588 bis
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 03:32:35 -0000

On 09/30/2012 06:15 PM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote:

> Hi Glen,
 >
 > After the list of avps, we should say:
 >
 > "Diameter messages containing these AVPs and any other AVP considered
 > as security-sensitive MUST only be sent..."

OK.

...