[Din] I-D: The R5N Distributed Hash Table

"Schanzenbach, Martin" <mschanzenbach@posteo.de> Mon, 29 August 2022 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
X-Original-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F040C14EB1C for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NO0t_uFCYWzD for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17EC5C1524D9 for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62861240105 for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:18:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1661775523; bh=DRYbe5i0Zx8SUrEzPjYBEZ5NcHSQOOg3M4/xvX5jn6I=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=eAcpsT0NV80jgqyJ83YXCEs3vSV2Br81yUYU9q7ChxiMrz8rn1cc1QhC+odWEwi43 kmWBJY3A9Ydx0YTrqLPtMH7tPjaYd2doCpy6a0V1DzMCDJk3fswXKyjmnhilD09bdT 1xiVUf4jR6RqfyRgGFp9Jm1m0hcpcWTfI4WzEEnJTtYvyuSbZcU6aShLgxl3xD+Z+e EHFch2OnjV6vlHIpTaRRtnauzztUwC0f89CtIeR3Lb6GPvgTDiC68uG8RbFlBy/y6W 1RTfJaLL8mBzsL/7e5dHF4MokJ1WPY6jQHmh49on5sTFe2T0tH98Bpj4XRJDnyyCK0 wsVnmMMmn+vuw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MGTxZ3kT6z9rxd for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:18:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Schanzenbach, Martin" <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F54B27BC-6B6E-437E-9BB7-CDB7DF3F28A2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Message-Id: <FEA8D5F6-AB8F-47F8-B511-7587CCD5F0EB@posteo.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:18:40 +0000
To: din@irtf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/AbaQRZ1ZVlKJ78DLShkmUR8oWhU>
Subject: [Din] I-D: The R5N Distributed Hash Table
X-BeenThere: din@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din/>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:18:51 -0000

Hi dinrg!

I hope this email finds you all in good health.

Wwe wanted to touch ground with you if any of you would be interested in our specification
on R5N, a protocol for randomised recursive routing for restricted-route networks. [1]
It is a distributed hash table protocol and we currently have two independent implementations.
The document is not finished but in a parseable state and feedback is very welcome either way.

This DHT can serve as a basis for GNS, for which there is a draft already quite far into the ISE process [2].
In fact, it is what our GNS implementations are using at the moment.

Thank you and have a nice day
Martin

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schanzen-r5n/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schanzen-gns/