[Din] A paper on decentralized internet resource infrastructure
"Liubingyang (Bryan)" <liubingyang@huawei.com> Tue, 31 July 2018 06:22 UTC
Return-Path: <liubingyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A960130DDB for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1__VbmKl6oL for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBA8130934 for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dggemi403-hub.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id BEFF0244587CE for <din@irtf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:22:26 +0800 (CST)
Received: from DGGEMI421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.150) by dggemi403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:22:26 +0800
Received: from DGGEMI526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.127]) by dggemi421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:22:25 +0800
From: "Liubingyang (Bryan)" <liubingyang@huawei.com>
To: "din@irtf.org" <din@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: A paper on decentralized internet resource infrastructure
Thread-Index: AdQolXTUCPnJFJ9pQ/eST65rCMdhvw==
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:22:25 +0000
Message-ID: <C1CE72EE84AF224E94DA21AE134209EE01BB0015@DGGEMI526-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.168.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/O6_PH62wWibPfXfhlqeYMkj5dJs>
Subject: [Din] A paper on decentralized internet resource infrastructure
X-BeenThere: din@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din/>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:22:35 -0000
Hello, We just submitted a paper "An experiment in distributed Internet address management using blockchains" on arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.10528. This may address some of questions about IP address management asked in the DINRG meeting in Montreal. Note, however, the solution described in the paper is not exactly the same as what presented in DINRG, https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-dinrg-decentralized-internet-resource-trust-infrastructure-bingyang-liu-00. The major difference is that what we presented is based on permissioned chain, while the paper describes an experiment based on a public chain. Any comment is welcome. Thank you very much! Bingyang (Bryan)
- [Din] A paper on decentralized internet resource … Liubingyang (Bryan)