[Din] FW: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt
Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com> Tue, 30 August 2022 11:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EBEC1850EC for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NAhqH9BdhYf5 for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F06FC14F6E7 for <din@irtf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml713-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MH4Jq0SBVz67xb4 for <din@irtf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:07:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) by fraeml713-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:07:55 +0200
Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) by lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:07:54 +0100
Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.191.162.67]) by lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.191.162.67]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:07:54 +0100
From: Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>
To: "din@irtf.org" <din@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHYvFXRpoEBnPYoVU24Ya1ICBh1C63HRoNwgAAB+dA=
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:07:54 +0000
Message-ID: <d2e411cd6c8641909e25711a2a82670f@huawei.com>
References: <166185296562.46970.7307008585401163576@ietfa.amsl.com> <f0d7a52c2411404987c78e8e04752727@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <f0d7a52c2411404987c78e8e04752727@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.215.190]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/Rf6eD-2ubw7rMzHUI9AvGv66PNY>
Subject: [Din] FW: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt
X-BeenThere: din@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din/>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:08:02 -0000
Dear all, The below mentioned update to our draft on DLT impact on networks may be of interest to this community, particularly in relation to utilizing permissionless DLTs for decentralization of Internet/network functions. Any comments as well as thoughts for contributions are warmly welcome. Best, Dirk -----Original Message----- From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dirk Trossen Sent: 30 August 2022 13:04 To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org> Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt Dear all, We have updated our draft outlining the impact of (permissionless) DLTs on provider networks; this is a smaller update before we will look into adding more experimental insights into it for a next revision. One area where our insights may be useful is for considerations of DLT use in network functions, as discussed in the DLT in BGP draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcbride-rtgwg-bgp-blockchain/) At this stage, I would like to invite possible contributors to, e.g., insights or also possible network technologies that may reduce such impact. We see the latter aspect as most directly related to possible RTG WG work and interest. Any comments on this work are warmly welcome. Best, Dirk -----Original Message----- From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Sent: 30 August 2022 11:49 To: David Guzman <david.guzman@huawei.com>; Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>; Mike Mc Bride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>; Mike McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>; Xinxin Fan <xinxin@iotex.io> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt A new version of I-D, draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Dirk Trossen and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts Revision: 02 Title: Impact of DLTs on Provider Networks Document date: 2022-08-30 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 19 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-trossen-rtgwg-impact-of-dlts-02 Abstract: This document discusses the impact of distributed ledger technologies being realized over IP-based provider networks. The focus here lies on the impact that the DLT communication patterns have on efficiency of resource usage in the underlying networks. We provide initial insights into experimental results to quantify this impact in terms of inefficient and wasted communication, aligned along challenges that the DLT realization over IP networks faces. This document intends to outline this impact but also opportunities for network innovations to improve on the identified impact as well as the overall service quality. While this document does not promote specific solutions that capture those opportunities, it invites the wider community working on DLT and network solutions alike to contribute to the insights in this document to aid future research and development into possible solution concepts and technologies. The findings presented here have first been reported within the similarly titled whitepaper released by the Industry IoT Consortium (IIC) [IIC_whitepaper]. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- [Din] FW: New Version Notification for draft-tros… Dirk Trossen