IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dir-coord] Fwd: [Netconf] FW: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-09, draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-07 and draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 18 December 2015 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BBF1B3792 for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:44:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmJ3au5V76pB for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5901B3796 for <dir-coord@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:44:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1450460650; x=1451670250; h=subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zddmZKBu1mrDk7afrWnTBya7K9zU+RTf8AMqOM57ARE=; b=VjoKidsang5XeBjp8qDG5iEBi+AJQ06KFXYzcXw4QMLKTGhKQ33vMwlW exzTZsifNz7DIEnL8rGYC5EOrgV+V8WKZtplxSfl4tvl6to8QNeKP6MeG cDRSIlTQ9yC1YBj3vysHyt1xh8uMe1QkLcSQVCnloRMNjQ6kaT4+Q4vUw o=;
X-Files: Attached Message Part : 133
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CwBAB3RXRW/xbLJq1egm6BHm2/RhcBCYUiSgKCBwEBAQEBAYEAC4Q0AQEBBAEBARoGCkEKARAcAwEBAQoWBAcCAgkDAgECARUmAQEIBg0GAgEBiCsOq2yRWwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ8JhlaEfoR7gnyBSQWWf4JvgWJqiA+BXEmDfIMFI4QWi1aDdGSCRIFBPTQBhRABAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,447,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217";a="609145695"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Dec 2015 17:44:06 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tBIHi6km032085; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:44:06 GMT
References: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F81986CBA6@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
To: "dir-coord@ietf.org" <dir-coord@ietf.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F81986CBA6@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Message-ID: <567445E5.6010002@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:44:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F81986CBA6@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050206070000040507040303"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dir-coord/0a7Q8xvS5qESbF30bwSt-0hTlkw>
Cc: "netconf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [dir-coord] Fwd: [Netconf] FW: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-09, draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-07 and draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03
X-BeenThere: dir-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is an e-mail alias for the organisers of IETF directorates." <dir-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dir-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:dir-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:44:14 -0000

Dear all,

We would be interested to have an early directorate review on these 
drafts, specifically from the security directorate.

Regards, Benoit


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[Netconf] FW: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-09, 
draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-07 and draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03
Date: 	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:17:22 +0000
From: 	Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nokia.com>
To: 	netconf@ietf.org <netconf@ietf.org>



The deadline is for sure January 22, /2016/EOB PT.

Mehmet

*From:*Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich)
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:59 PM
*To:* netconf@ietf.org
*Cc:* 'core@ietf.org' <core@ietf.org>; 'i2rs@ietf.org' <i2rs@ietf.org>; 
'6lo@ietf.org' <6lo@ietf.org>; '6tisch@ietf.org' <6tisch@ietf.org>
*Subject:* WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-09, 
draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-07 and draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03

Dear NETCONF WG,

we hereby issue a WG Last Call for the drafts below:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-09.txt

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-07.txt

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03.txt

Please review and send your comments to the NETCONF WG mailing list by 
January 22, 2015 EOB PT.

The drafts on RESTCONF, YANG patch and YANG library are planned to 
publish as standard track documents.

As RESTCONF is a major protocol we seek a detailed and thorough review 
within NETCONF WG but also by the related WGs before publishing.

Therefore the WGLC is planned to finalize on January 22th (covering the 
holiday time in between) and APP, INT and RTG area ADs will be informed 
as well as Core, I2RS, 6lo, and 6tisch WGs are invited to review.

Please take your time to review the documents and send your comments to 
the NETCONF maillist by the deadline.

Please state on NETCONF maillist also explicitly, whether you have 
read/reviewed and whether you support the publication.

Furthermore please indicate if you plan to implement or have already 
implementations for RESTCONF and its supplementary drafts.

Thank you for your review and kind help getting RESTCONF specifications 
stable.

Best Regards,

Mehmet and Mahesh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email