[dir-coord] Requesting SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Thu, 21 November 2013 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562951AE138 for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 05:17:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZBKzS4Og9ezj for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 05:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94DF1ADC03 for <dir-coord@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 05:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rALDGrjC029064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:16:53 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.7/8.12.11) id rALDGpPa000659; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:16:51 +0200 (EET)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21134.1987.918612.52011@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:16:51 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <16F5011B-A87C-4BE3-8AA4-F47C13E830F6@cisco.com>
References: <16F5011B-A87C-4BE3-8AA4-F47C13E830F6@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 1 min
X-Total-Time: 1 min
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, "dir-coord@ietf.org" <dir-coord@ietf.org>, John Brzozowski <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
Subject: [dir-coord] Requesting SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security
X-BeenThere: dir-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is an e-mail alias for the organisers of IETF directorates." <dir-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dir-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:dir-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:17:15 -0000

Fred Baker (fred) writes:
> This document is right now in WGLC. Some points have been raised,
> which I imagine will warrant a revision. However, there are a lot of
> claims being made in and about the draft to the effect that it is a
> security solution that Swisscom has deployed and sees no problems
> with, and therefore the IETF should bless it as a general firewall
> solution. I would appreciate a timely review from the Security
> Directorate that would help us know whether it is likely to pass
> muster with the IESG, and if not, what types problems the
> directorate sees and what types of solutions would be acceptable. 

This was assigned to Paul Hoffman today, I put the deadline for next
week on the review.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi