IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dir-coord] Review tracking requirements draft

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 21 April 2015 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BE81B2AE2 for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jf1_0AqF8IV6 for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6671B2ADF for <dir-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CCEBED6; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:42:19 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oj9GpLASUZFr; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:42:18 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.17.62]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BD9DBED0; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:42:18 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <5536A81A.2090206@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:42:18 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, dir-coord@ietf.org
References: <54DA39DD.8010702@nostrum.com> <54DAA4CE.3020306@cs.tcd.ie> <55368CF8.50603@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <55368CF8.50603@nostrum.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dir-coord/Y4c2c0TctzYXmdkK-fXG7HFdkHI>
Subject: Re: [dir-coord] Review tracking requirements draft
X-BeenThere: dir-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is an e-mail alias for the organisers of IETF directorates." <dir-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dir-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:dir-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:42:23 -0000

Hiya,

All those responses are fine. Just one comment.

On 21/04/15 18:46, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>
> I don't think we need it given our current notion of a review team.
> We'd just put the poor student on the team, no?

If we wanted this concept, (which I doubt) then probably not.  The
usual case in academia would be a prof who delegates to a student
with specific expertise, but the same student probably won't get
another paper for a long time so wouldn't be added to the roster,
e.g. for secdir. But that can all be handled via text, so it's not
a deal.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email