Re: [dir-coord] Requesting SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821A61AE058 for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:08:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fztM2XC0_WXr for <dir-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:08:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9550D1AE039 for <dir-coord@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:08:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1529; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385053694; x=1386263294; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=/hp9tKkqjksLr4mWWTBK1MVb+N3wYO2BGeAQGm3fTA0=; b=klgRSX0AzSM952eP7R97g+TD2oU2XpFlYnlHeqZM96uZhtAGUalSIa3W fOddkW6OV1QHMBunijYLTKzuooB+uA8Hk29NhWDdQdhyNrtcZWk6DCB0L g29ep3lhF4YSqD998IQlK1yKlILkChLifgsD+Y/FQPkJio7ZIp13Bco2y k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgFAL48jlKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC7xVgSQWdIIlAQEBAwFlFAULAgEIRjIlAgQOBQ4Nh2AGwScXj2sHgyCBEgOQMIExhjGSEIFqgT6CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,745,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="1264474"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2013 17:08:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rALH8DD9026189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:08:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.136]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:08:13 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Thread-Topic: [dir-coord] Requesting SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security
Thread-Index: AQHO5rv66Cg8gqO5nU+0E3kf4ta10powT6EA
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:08:12 +0000
Message-ID: <7CEA2D2B-E583-480A-839C-5F6A959E4B30@cisco.com>
References: <16F5011B-A87C-4BE3-8AA4-F47C13E830F6@cisco.com> <21134.1987.918612.52011@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <21134.1987.918612.52011@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0CE65264-DC3E-458E-8E06-94FCBEFB6BC7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "<paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "dir-coord@ietf.org" <dir-coord@ietf.org>, John Brzozowski <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
Subject: Re: [dir-coord] Requesting SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security
X-BeenThere: dir-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is an e-mail alias for the organisers of IETF directorates." <dir-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dir-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:dir-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dir-coord>, <mailto:dir-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:08:22 -0000

On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:

> Fred Baker (fred) writes:
>> This document is right now in WGLC. Some points have been raised,
>> which I imagine will warrant a revision. However, there are a lot of
>> claims being made in and about the draft to the effect that it is a
>> security solution that Swisscom has deployed and sees no problems
>> with, and therefore the IETF should bless it as a general firewall
>> solution. I would appreciate a timely review from the Security
>> Directorate that would help us know whether it is likely to pass
>> muster with the IESG, and if not, what types problems the
>> directorate sees and what types of solutions would be acceptable. 
> 
> This was assigned to Paul Hoffman today, I put the deadline for next
> week on the review.

Thanks

> -- 
> kivinen@iki.fi