Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net> Fri, 01 June 2007 13:06 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hu6qI-0006cC-Jf; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:06:58 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Htt82-00026j-Rd for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 18:28:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htt82-00025A-HK for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 18:28:22 -0400
Received: from av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net ([81.228.9.179]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htt82-0004WA-47 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 18:28:22 -0400
Received: by av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CF35D389D6; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:28:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B853838710; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:28:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from henriknordstrom.net (81-233-163-21-no84.tbcn.telia.com [81.233.163.21]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C98437E45; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:28:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (henriknordstrom.net [192.168.1.2] (may be forged)) by henriknordstrom.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l4VMS6Dd019554; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:28:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis
From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <8FBD37BC-E635-485D-A368-22D9DE332498@mnot.net>
References: <BA772834-227A-4C1B-9534-070C50DF05B3@mnot.net> <392C98BA-E7B8-44ED-964B-82FC48162924@mnot.net> <1358AF2C-F967-46D6-B291-BC65126CCDF6@gbiv.com> <8FBD37BC-E635-485D-A368-22D9DE332498@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Uu23rNYsS9bfJqA9At5g"
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:28:05 +0200
Message-Id: <1180650485.5423.51.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.2, clamav-milter version 0.88.2 on henriknordstrom.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:06:57 -0400
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

fre 2007-06-01 klockan 07:15 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> Somehow, HTTP has been implemented and become one of the most widely- 
> deployed application protocols today, despite your claims that the  
> spec needs to be re-written from scratch. I don't hear *anyone* else  
> saying that this necessary, or a realistic option.

It probably is from the perspective of having a easy to read and error
free protocol specification, but this is not one of the requirements for
an IETF protocol standard.

Imho the goal of this effort is to push HTTP/1.1 specifications forward
to the level that it can be accepted as an IEFT standard. Not to make a
perfect specification.

Once that is accomplished work should start on the next version of HTTP
to improve both specifications and protocol based on what is learnt from
HTTP, WebDAV, CalDAV and other HTTP extensions or applications using
HTTP as a meaningful substrate, but that's a separate effort.

Regards
Henrik