IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Mon, 11 June 2007 03:34 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxafL-0000sJ-1O; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:34:03 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HxafJ-0000sD-Vo for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:34:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxafJ-0000s5-Lx for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:34:01 -0400
Received: from shu.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxafI-0000lh-Fs for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:34:01 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shu.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82CD1EE1C4; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:33:56 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new with ClamAV and SpamAssasin at cs.utk.edu
Received: from shu.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bes.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ccmdxNnNHhb5; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:33:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (user-119b1dm.biz.mindspring.com [66.149.133.182]) by shu.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD801EE1FE; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:33:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <466CC26F.90603@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:33:03 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Subject: Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis
References: <BA772834-227A-4C1B-9534-070C50DF05B3@mnot.net> <392C98BA-E7B8-44ED-964B-82FC48162924@mnot.net> <6AE049B9045C00064222693F@[10.1.110.5]> <1181250794.24162.109.camel@henriknordstrom.net> <46696B98.1090201@cisco.com> <1181342059.4818.63.camel@henriknordstrom.net> <8DD2BD5A-9068-43C3-973E-382FAD2E0EA8@osafoundation.org> <1181532224.3389.47.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
In-Reply-To: <1181532224.3389.47.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
OpenPGP: id=E1473978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

>> Digest has a bad reputation particularly among Web App developers for
>> a number of reasons, some inherent to the design and specification,
>> some stemming from implementation and deployment choices.
>>     
>
> Nearly all is implementation.
>   
ah, but what's the reason for all of those implementation-imposed
constraints?

Keith

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email