IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

<Bill.Oxley@cox.com> Thu, 17 May 2007 15:58 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoiNE-0001SL-UN; Thu, 17 May 2007 11:58:40 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho31o-0007SK-PZ for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 15:49:48 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho31o-0007SC-G6 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 15:49:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho2zY-00077k-65 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 15:47:28 -0400
Received: from post4.cox.com ([24.248.72.37] helo=cox.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho2zW-00009f-OC for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 15:47:28 -0400
Received: from ([192.168.72.254]) by post4.cox.com with ESMTP id KP-VXH63.248442692; Tue, 15 May 2007 15:32:09 -0400
Received: from CATL0MS21.CORP.COX.COM ([10.64.210.21]) by catl0ms22.CORP.COX.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 15 May 2007 15:32:09 -0400
Received: from CATL0MS02.corp.cox.com ([10.62.210.88]) by CATL0MS21.CORP.COX.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 15 May 2007 15:32:09 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:32:08 -0400
Message-ID: <BB621D48443A854A89D86528F915864C042F4C65@CATL0MS02.corp.cox.com>
In-Reply-To: <01MGM4D77428000053@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
thread-index: AceXJL/p+nLURLiDSHCnoolTKHn08QAAvKtg
References: "Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 23:20:28 -0400"<464926FC.30109@att.com> <01MGM4D77428000053@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: Bill.Oxley@cox.com
To: ned+dkim@mauve.mrochek.com, tony@att.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2007 19:32:09.0097 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA730F90:01C79727]
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
X-TMDA-Confirmed: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:49:48 -0400
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:58:36 -0400
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Add a warning note

Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of
ned+dkim@mauve.mrochek.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:03 PM
To: Tony Hansen
Cc: Apps Discuss; IETF General Discussion Mailing List;
ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> > I share your concerns about removing rules that are already in use
--
> > that would generally be a bad thing.  However I'm interested in the
> > consensus around whether a warning or a deprecation statement would
be a
> > good thing.

> LWSP has a valid meaning and use, and its being misapplied somewhere
> doesn't make that meaning and usage invalid. I could see a note being
> added. However, anything more than that is totally inappropriate.

Full agreement with Tony here.

				Ned
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email