Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Tue, 04 December 2007 18:06 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izc9g-0003kC-BR; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:06:00 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Izc9f-0003k3-QW for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:05:59 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izc9e-0003jq-TY for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:05:59 -0500
Received: from ka.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.221]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izc9c-0004p9-Po for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:05:58 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A9ACB45C; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:05:55 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new with ClamAV and SpamAssasin at cs.utk.edu
Received: from ka.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ka.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rIWJsgkI2+Cf; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:05:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (dhcp-17a4.ietf70.org [130.129.23.164]) by ka.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8188CB440; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:05:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <475596E6.502@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:05:26 -0800
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt
References: <E1It5KL-00032t-Up@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <20071203094351.GA19449@nic.fr> <2639.1196720643.545129@peirce.dave.cridland.net> <20071204161659.GA19161@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20071204161659.GA19161@nic.fr>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5
OpenPGP: id=E1473978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> If I understand you well, you suggest to create (not describe) a new
> concept, "global subaddressing", with a standard delimiter and
> subaddressing-aware software, allowing new tricks (like the MLM you
> mention, which accepts mail only from subscribers and who can
> recognize them even when they use subaddressing).
>
> That's may be a good idea but it is something new, not a description
> of a current practice.
>   
I don't know how widespread the practice is, but my "bulk_mailer"
software (which used to get a lot of use, anyway) has supported this
kind of fuzzy matching since 2002.  (it also does fuzzy matching on the
domain part, so that a.example.com is treated as equivalent to
b.example.com and example.com)