Re: draft-klensin-net-utf8-06

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 16 October 2007 08:11 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhWX-0006vm-Eh; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:11:33 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhWW-0006rf-6M for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:11:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhWV-0006rU-DO for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:11:31 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhhWP-00013o-7N for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:11:31 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 23DC71C00EA; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:11:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5E81C00D8; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:11:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1136D58ECCF; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:11:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:11:14 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: Re: draft-klensin-net-utf8-06
Message-ID: <20071016081114.GA4599@nic.fr>
References: <93F25E18AB3DA3EB0599F092@p3.JCK.COM> <fev7so$bt0$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fev7so$bt0$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:17:33AM +0200,
 Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote 
 a message of 51 lines which said:

> I think you have to mention LS u+2028 and maybe also PS u+2029
> somewhere.

<über-troll>We should drop the ambiguous, old, ASCII and
typewriter-specific CR and LF and standardize only the Unicode proper
characters, PS and LS for Net-UTF8.</über-troll>

#define TROLL 0
I suggest the following text in 2.1 "Definitions":

For compatibility reasons with the oldest practice, the Unicode
characters U+2028, Line separator, and U+2029, Paragraph separator,
are similarly NOT RECOMMENDED.