Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation" reference

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 23 May 2007 21:16 UTC

Message-ID: <4654AEEC.80503@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:15:24 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: discuss@apps.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation" reference
References: <46523D89.70905@dcrocker.net> <20070523084651.GB57435@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <465429B2.8030006@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <465429B2.8030006@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Folks,

I think we figured out what this was about.  The 'name formation' meant the 
aggregation of characters that form a rulename.

The revised precedence list reads:

 > >                  <t>Rule name, prose-val, Terminal value<t>
 > >                  <t>Comment</t>
 > >                  <t>Value range</t>
 > >                  <t>Repetition</t>
 > >                  <t>Grouping, Optional</t>
 > >                  <t>Concatenation</t>
 > >                  <t>Alternative</t>


We believe that each item on the first line is explained with existing 
definitions or text.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation… Dave Crocker
Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation" re… Dave Crocker
Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation… Philip Guenther
Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation… Tony Finch
Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation… Clive D.W. Feather
Re: Seeking clarification of ABNF "name formation… Julian Reschke