Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 05 December 2007 10:54 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izrte-0006k7-He; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:54:30 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Izrtd-0006fo-62 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:54:29 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izrtc-0006fS-P4 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:54:28 -0500
Received: from ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.136]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izrtb-0000lB-4V for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:54:28 -0500
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:54409) by ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1IzrtX-0006Lx-K1 (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:54:23 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1IzrtX-0004JJ-6D (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:54:23 +0000
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:54:23 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-newman-email-subaddr-01.txt
In-Reply-To: <2639.1196812257.522519@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712051053370.30251@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <E1It5KL-00032t-Up@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <20071203094351.GA19449@nic.fr> <2639.1196720643.545129@peirce.dave.cridland.net> <20071204161659.GA19161@nic.fr> <2639.1196812257.522519@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
> An MUA wishing to provide a user-friendly UI to subaddressing also needs to
> know the convention, in order to be capable of forming local-parts for use in
> both message header fields and envelope reverse-paths. If it's additionally
> performing some specific actions on message which are to be considered
> directly addressed to the user, then it needs to know for this, too.

A particular example would be an in-MUA Sieve implementation.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
SOLE LUNDY FASTNET IRISH SEA SHANNON: WEST OR SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8,
OCCASIONALLY SEVERE GALE 9. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH, OCCASIONALLY HIGH. RAIN OR
SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.