Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Tue, 11 September 2007 21:05 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVCvN-0000qd-0m; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:33 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IVCvK-0000g4-5u for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:30 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVCvD-0000Vx-A3 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:23 -0400
Received: from bes.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.220]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVCvC-0007JD-59 for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:23 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bes.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31708103648; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new with ClamAV and SpamAssasin at cs.utk.edu
Received: from bes.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bes.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YkyNCOm84XO5; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (user-119b1dm.biz.mindspring.com [66.149.133.182]) by bes.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27C6103118; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <46E70307.3090909@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:05:11 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk
Subject: Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)
References: <46E2E54A.2050406@isode.com> <8B056441-7E57-46D4-9A2C-5BF7DE0297BF@muada.com> <420921CE-C4A9-49A8-9626-2BEAB70D7107@multicasttech.com> <26C12754-DA05-4545-84E8-2ECE136C5A2D@muada.com> <20070909234839.GA2020@boreas.isi.edu> <003101c7f465$9b90c9a0$0b00a8c0@CPQ86763045110> <01ML8DYIHPJQ003GRV@mauve.mrochek.com> <46E6F657.4040204@cs.utk.edu> <01ML8GHD48YO00005F@mauve.mrochek.com> <012801c7f4b6$4b2faf70$0b00a8c0@CPQ86763045110>
In-Reply-To: <012801c7f4b6$4b2faf70$0b00a8c0@CPQ86763045110>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3
OpenPGP: id=E1473978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: ned.freed@mrochek.com, ietf@ietf.org, discuss@apps.ietf.org, 'Iljitsch van Beijnum' <iljitsch@muada.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, bmanning@ISI.EDU, saag@mit.edu, ietf-http-auth@osafoundation.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Oh, it's very useful to have consistent terminology. And if a document
needs to use new terms, they should definitely be defined before use.  I
just don't want to encourage people to make up new terms (or more
likely, whole new paradigms with their own lexicons) when existing ones
will do.  I'm reminded of recent work in NEA, but they're not the only ones.
> I agree.  Which is why a Terms and Definitions section is darn useful as is
> an overall Term Bank.  However, I will not labour the point as I have long
> ago found that trying to sell Terminology standardization to industry is
> practically impossible - unless you rename it as Knowledge Management.
>