Re: Test

"tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> Fri, 08 February 2008 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D46928C480; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.407, BAYES_50=0.001, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVnGBkM9dpXH; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:20:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C36428C384; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7F28C384 for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:20:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlVX-2s0hEbs for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291D528C378 for <discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:20:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Trace: 36959525/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$MX-ACCEPTED/pipex-infrastructure/62.241.163.7
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 62.241.163.7
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: cfinss@dial.pipex.com
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CACE7rEc+8aMH/2dsb2JhbABCiiCiCA
X-IP-Direction: IN
Received: from blaster.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.163.7]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2008 19:22:14 +0000
Received: from pc6 (1Cust171.tnt3.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net [62.188.132.171]) by blaster.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B859BE0000AD; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <002101c86a7f$3b9b8d60$0601a8c0@pc6>
From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: "Lars Eggert" <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <035301c867fc$c78a2c80$0601a8c0@pc6> <00bd01c869ba$93689f80$0601a8c0@pc6> <965AFB39-2C26-4650-870D-157F6F6DBE4E@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: Test
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:22:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Cc: discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Part of the migration announcement was that there was to be a signficant
flattening of the namespace, so for 'foo.ietf.org' to become 'ietf.org' was to
be expected, but I did expect the various 'foo' to become part of the local
part.

On the other hand, being 'discuss@ietf.org' could be said to reflect the
importance of apps among the various IETF areas:-)

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lars Eggert" <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
Cc: <discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: Test


> On 2008-2-7, at 20:35, ext tom.petch wrote:
> > In case you were wondering what I was on about, this mailing list is
> > now
> > discuss@ietf.org
>
> Well, it used to be discuss@apps.ietf.org, and I guess the non-
> secretariat apps server was retired?
>
> Lars