IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 31 May 2007 08:21 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htfu8-0006K0-FM; Thu, 31 May 2007 04:21:08 -0400
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Htfu7-0006Je-5l for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 04:21:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htfu6-0006JV-SE for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 04:21:06 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htfu5-0004sm-FL for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 04:21:06 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 May 2007 08:21:04 -0000
Received: from p508FA20F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.162.15] by mail.gmx.net (mp053) with SMTP; 31 May 2007 10:21:04 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+GGXd4D8CG+ZIputf7vf51+wT55RRL/lilof/ETB enJ1ayejkp6Ohb
Message-ID: <465E8569.7080504@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:20:57 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis
References: <BA772834-227A-4C1B-9534-070C50DF05B3@mnot.net> <392C98BA-E7B8-44ED-964B-82FC48162924@mnot.net> <p06240843c2833f4d7f2f@[10.20.30.108]> <465D9142.9050506@gmx.de> <465D987F.5070906@cisco.com> <C1E6F3CB-49C6-4C0F-955A-3D69D26987C6@mnot.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705310312560.7945@ubzre.j3.bet> <465E7B2F.8010304@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <465E7B2F.8010304@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Eliot Lear wrote:
> An authentication requirements document sits in "Last Call" right now as 
> we speak.  My concern is that we'll close 2616bis only to discover that 
> not only do we need a 2617bis but also a 2616bisbis.  The only real 
> question is whether or not we can move fast enough on the auth work so 
> that you're not left twiddling your thumbs too long.

Pointer, please :-).

Best regards, Julian

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email