Re: analysis of YANG vs. RELAX NG

["Rohan Mahy" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Juergen,

On Nov 28, 2007 2:56 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:43:45PM -0800, Rohan Mahy wrote:
>
> > You can express this very easily like this:
> >
> > <define name="get-config" combine="interleave">
> >   <ref name="ifAdminStatus"/>
> > </define>
> >
> > <define name="get" combine="interleave">
> >   <ref name="ifAdminStatus"/>
> > </define>
> >
> > <define name="get" combine="interleave">
> >   <ref name="ifOperStatus"/>
> > </define>
> >
> > or in short form:
> >
> > get-config &= ifAdminStatus
> > get &= ifAdminStatus
> > get &= ifOperStatus
>
> You are suggesting to extend the definition of the NETCONF operations
> get, get-config, edit-config etc. for every possible data item they
> might carry?


I am suggesting that an implementation "extend" the definition of each
netconf operation to include each top-level data item they actually
understand and use.  I hope you see the distinction.

thanks,
-rohan