Re: Test
' =JeffH ' <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Thu, 07 February 2008 20:57 UTC
Return-Path: <discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEB03A78C5; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:57:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.116, BAYES_40=-0.185, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0j2D78FqZ0ZG; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:57:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184123A7928; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:57:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E184B3A6E2F for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:57:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OVgMTao4rF3s for <discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound-mail-106.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-106.bluehost.com [69.89.22.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F23073A7140 for <discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17245 invoked by uid 0); 7 Feb 2008 20:58:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box7.bluehost.com) (69.89.30.147) by xmail.bluehost.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2008 20:58:04 -0000
Received: from [209.234.108.194] (helo=KingsMountain.com) by box7.bluehost.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1JNDoo-0000MN-FQ for discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:58:02 -0700
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-7) with nmh-1.1
Subject: Re: Test
To: discuss@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> 's message of Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:56:04 -0800
From: ' =JeffH ' <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:58:04 -0800
X-Identified-User: {32571:box7.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:bopbeforesmtp 209.234.108.194 authed with kingsmountain.com}
Message-Id: <20080207205633.F23073A7140@core3.amsl.com>
X-BeenThere: discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ' =JeffH ' <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Uh yeah, that's a bug -- the list is for general "applications area" discussions. =JeffH